Closed
Bug 672262
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Firefox 8.0a1 Crash [@ js::Bindings::getLocalNameArray(JSContext*, js::Vector<JSAtom*, int, js::TempAllocPolicy>*) ]
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: marcia, Assigned: Waldo)
Details
(Keywords: crash, regression)
Crash Data
Seen while looking at trunk crash stats - https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/list?signature=js::Bindings::getLocalNameArray%28JSContext*,%20js::Vector%3CJSAtom*,%20int,%20js::TempAllocPolicy%3E*%29
Crashes started up showing the 2011070600 build. Possible regression range: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=3f27dc203e62&tochange=58101c64c83c
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/6d77eb18-8561-4ee4-af93-bf0aa2110718
Frame Module Signature [Expand] Source
0 xul.dll js::Bindings::getLocalNameArray js/src/jsscript.cpp:179
1 xul.dll js::Interpret js/src/jsinterp.cpp:4594
2 xul.dll xul.dll@0x3d703f
3 xul.dll xul.dll@0x3d703f
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
This is probably me via bug 646574. I'll be all over this with a reproducible testcase. :-)
Assignee: general → jwalden+bmo
| Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Keywords: regression
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
This is the #1 topcrash on Nightly right now - Jeff, could you try to figure things out from the crash stacks?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
It looks like the crash is consistently from the interpreter in either JSOP_GETUPVAR_DBG or JSOP_CALLUPVAR_DBG. The getLocalNameArray call hasn't gotten to an interesting point in execution yet: the crash is on a line to grow the passed-in vector by a certain amount, leaving the storage uninitialized. The crash is a read violation for 0x48 on x86, 0x70 on x86-64. 0x70 matches offsetof(JSScript, bindings) in my x86-64 debug build. So maybe we're somehow getting a callupvar or getupvar in debug mode, and somehow the fun->script() has no bindings. But that doesn't make much sense, because code before the likely regressor did an identical bit of dereferencing of fun->script().bindings, which should have crashed in basically the same way.
A testcase would still be quite helpful. Since it appears we have opcodes implicating debug mode, there might be a better change of reproducing this with Firebug running. But that doesn't make much sense, either, because the reports I semi-randomly selected didn't have extensions installed. So, yeah. Testcase still very much wanted.
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> It looks like the crash is consistently from the interpreter in either
> JSOP_GETUPVAR_DBG or JSOP_CALLUPVAR_DBG. The getLocalNameArray call hasn't
> gotten to an interesting point in execution yet: the crash is on a line to
> grow the passed-in vector by a certain amount, leaving the storage
> uninitialized. The crash is a read violation for 0x48 on x86, 0x70 on
> x86-64. 0x70 matches offsetof(JSScript, bindings) in my x86-64 debug build.
> So maybe we're somehow getting a callupvar or getupvar in debug mode, and
> somehow the fun->script() has no bindings.
Wouldn't that mean that fun->script() is null?
> But that doesn't make much
> sense, because code before the likely regressor did an identical bit of
> dereferencing of fun->script().bindings, which should have crashed in
> basically the same way.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Er, yes, it would, sorry. (I wrote the first half of the comment before realizing 0x70 == offsetof(JSScript, bindings).) The subsequent point still remains true: if fun->script().bindings is a null-dereference now as part of this bug, it should have been before as well, or so I read the code.
Maybe I'm misreading something, but it seems like this stopped happening on 7/14. Did something relevant land around then?
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Interesting, yes, no crashes with a Build ID later than 20110713. Suggests that something landed on 14th that fixed this.
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7)
> Interesting, yes, no crashes with a Build ID later than 20110713. Suggests
> that something landed on 14th that fixed this.
Er, sorry, "landed on the 13th that fixed this in the build from the 14th" is correct.
Updated•15 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
| Reporter | ||
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
Although this seems gone on the trunk, I do see some Aurora crashes from 20110807 with this signature - https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/dd5e390e-2d5a-4108-8c3b-f16902110807 is one example I see in crash stats.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
This signature is showing up in the explosive report today for Firefox 7: https://crash-analysis.mozilla.com/rkaiser/2011-10-03/2011-10-03.firefox.7.explosiveness.html. Do we think this is the same issue as this bug or should I open a new one?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
I don't know, but given that the comments here are messy about whether anything was or wasn't happening, let's go with a new one.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
Filed Bug 691847 per Comment 11.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•