Closed
Bug 675754
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Release notes for Bugzilla 4.0.2
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Documentation, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 4.0
People
(Reporter: LpSolit, Assigned: LpSolit)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
2.85 KB,
patch
|
mkanat
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
No description provided.
Flags: blocking4.0.2+
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Attachment #549960 -
Flags: review?(mkanat)
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 549960 [details] [diff] [review] patch, v1 Review of attachment 549960 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: template/en/default/pages/release-notes.html.tmpl @@ +90,5 @@ > + <li>Moving several [% terms.bugs %] at once into another product displayed the > + same confirmation page again and again, and changes were never committed > + (regressed in 4.0). > + (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663208">[% terms.Bug %] 663208</a>)</li> > + <li>Marking [% terms.abug %] as duplicate now works in Internet Explorer 9. as a duplicate @@ +102,5 @@ > + <li>Undefined [% terms.bug %] fields, such as the alias and custom fields of type > + "[% terms.Bug %] ID" are now really undefined instead of being set to an empty > + string. This change also affects WebServices methods. This change is consistent > + with how [% terms.Bugzilla %] 4.2 behaves. > + (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657561">[% terms.Bug %] 657561</a>)</li> The only part of this that should be relnoted is the WebService API change, otherwise it sounds confusingly like an important DB change, which it isn't. @@ +112,5 @@ > + (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655912">[% terms.Bug %] 655912</a>)</li> > + <li>Viewing [% terms.abug %] report should be significantly faster when your > + installation has many custom fields. > + (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634812">[% terms.Bug %] 634812</a>)</li> > +</ul> May also want to note: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652427 (dataloss on Back)
Attachment #549960 -
Flags: review?(mkanat) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2) > May also want to note: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652427 (dataloss on Back) This one is already in the relnotes, see the 5th item. :)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
Attachment #549960 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #550240 -
Flags: review?(mkanat)
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #550240 -
Flags: review?(mkanat) → review+
Updated•13 years ago
|
Flags: approval4.0+
Flags: approval+
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
Committing to: bzr+ssh://lpsolit%40gmail.com@bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/trunk/ modified template/en/default/pages/release-notes.html.tmpl Committed revision 7879. Committing to: bzr+ssh://lpsolit%40gmail.com@bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/4.0/ modified template/en/default/pages/release-notes.html.tmpl Committed revision 7630.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•