Closed Bug 675754 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

Release notes for Bugzilla 4.0.2

Categories

(Bugzilla :: Documentation, defect)

4.1.2
defect
Not set
blocker

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Bugzilla 4.0

People

(Reporter: LpSolit, Assigned: LpSolit)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

      No description provided.
Flags: blocking4.0.2+
Attached patch patch, v1 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #549960 - Flags: review?(mkanat)
Comment on attachment 549960 [details] [diff] [review]
patch, v1

Review of attachment 549960 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

::: template/en/default/pages/release-notes.html.tmpl
@@ +90,5 @@
> +  <li>Moving several [% terms.bugs %] at once into another product displayed the
> +    same confirmation page again and again, and changes were never committed
> +    (regressed in 4.0).
> +    (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663208">[% terms.Bug %] 663208</a>)</li>
> +  <li>Marking [% terms.abug %] as duplicate now works in Internet Explorer 9.

as a duplicate

@@ +102,5 @@
> +  <li>Undefined [% terms.bug %] fields, such as the alias and custom fields of type
> +    "[% terms.Bug %] ID" are now really undefined instead of being set to an empty
> +    string. This change also affects WebServices methods. This change is consistent
> +    with how [% terms.Bugzilla %] 4.2 behaves.
> +    (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657561">[% terms.Bug %] 657561</a>)</li>

The only part of this that should be relnoted is the WebService API change, otherwise it sounds confusingly like an important DB change, which it isn't.

@@ +112,5 @@
> +    (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655912">[% terms.Bug %] 655912</a>)</li>
> +  <li>Viewing [% terms.abug %] report should be significantly faster when your
> +    installation has many custom fields.
> +    (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634812">[% terms.Bug %] 634812</a>)</li>
> +</ul>

May also want to note:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652427 (dataloss on Back)
Attachment #549960 - Flags: review?(mkanat) → review-
(In reply to comment #2)
> May also want to note:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652427 (dataloss on Back)

This one is already in the relnotes, see the 5th item. :)
Attached patch patch, v2Splinter Review
Attachment #549960 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #550240 - Flags: review?(mkanat)
Attachment #550240 - Flags: review?(mkanat) → review+
Flags: approval4.0+
Flags: approval+
Committing to: bzr+ssh://lpsolit%40gmail.com@bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/trunk/
modified template/en/default/pages/release-notes.html.tmpl
Committed revision 7879.

Committing to: bzr+ssh://lpsolit%40gmail.com@bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/4.0/
modified template/en/default/pages/release-notes.html.tmpl
Committed revision 7630.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: