The goal is to have near 100% test coverage over the new config_manager.py in the new_conf branch before we start refactoring too much and consider new features within. The test coverage is currently 71% (see attached last output from coverage report). The command I use to generate this is: socorro@lucid64:~/dev/new_conf$ nosetests -s socorro.unittest.lib.testConfigurationManager:TestCase --with-cover --cover-html --cover-package="socorro.lib.config_manager"
Created attachment 553153 [details] Sample coverage analysis This is just a sample coverage report page. Just for the config_manager.py module.
Note to self/Lars: The tool I use to run tests is [python-gorun] which works great on Linux. Inside the directory ~/dev/new_conf I have a file called "gorun_settings.py" which currently looks like this:: DIRECTORIES = ( ('', 'nosetests -s socorro.unittest.lib.testConfigurationManager2:TestCase.test_create_ConfigurationManager_with_use_config_files'), # ('', 'nosetests -s socorro.unittest.lib.testConfigurationManager2:TestCase'), ) #nosetests -s socorro.unittest.lib.testConfigurationManager2:TestCase --with-cover --cover-html --cover-package="socorro.lib.config_manager" That makes it possible for me to just start gorun: $ gorun.py and it runs the tests over and over in a terminal. [https://github.com/peterbe/python-gorun/]
(In reply to Peter Bengtsson [:peterbe] from comment #2) > DIRECTORIES = ( > ('', 'nosetests -s > socorro.unittest.lib.testConfigurationManager2:TestCase. > test_create_ConfigurationManager_with_use_config_files'), > # ('', 'nosetests -s > socorro.unittest.lib.testConfigurationManager2:TestCase'), > ) > > #nosetests -s socorro.unittest.lib.testConfigurationManager2:TestCase > --with-cover --cover-html --cover-package="socorro.lib.config_manager" > Typo! Replace "testConfigurationManager2" with testConfigurationManager"
Instead of uploading a patch (because I've already committed it in the new_conf branch) see here: http://code.google.com/p/socorro/source/detail?r=3449 I'm currently stuck on tests that use `ConfigManager(..., use_config_files=True, ...)` because they need to wrap this `_application` stuff which I haven't really understood yet.
For what it's worth, development has moved here: https://github.com/twobraids/configman As of now, the code is 100% independent of Socorro. Has 68% test coverage, needs some more restructuring (tests directory, setup.py file)
Component: Socorro → General
Product: Webtools → Socorro
We have since moved properly to configman.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.