Closed Bug 691032 Opened 14 years ago Closed 14 years ago

[fr] Translate State of Mozilla mini-site

Categories

(www.mozilla.org :: General, defect)

Product:
www.mozilla.org
Component:
General
Type:
defect
Priority:
Not set
Severity:
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

Status:
RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: pascalc, Unassigned)

References

(
URL
)

Details

Attachments

(8 files, 4 obsolete files)

AHEAD page
3.66 KB, patch
bmo.cec
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
FAQ page
6.78 KB, patch
bmo.cec
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
relecture de la trad de OPPORTUNITIES
7.86 KB, patch
bmo.cec
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Liste modifs Rapport Moz 2010 par Banban
1.57 KB, text/plain
Details
prise en compte de plusieurs suggestions de Banban
6.22 KB, patch
pascalc
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
finetuning de lapage People
3.38 KB, patch
pascalc
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
finetuning de la page Faq
5.26 KB, patch
pascalc
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
autre titre pour éviter la répétition de "rapport"
487 bytes, patch
pascalc
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
This bug is for the translation of the new "State of Mozilla" sub-site inside of mozilla.org. The State of Mozilla site is an annual report explaining the situation of the Mozilla Foundation projects (financials, community, growth, challenges...). Here is the url on the development server: http://www-dev.allizom.org/fr/foundation/annualreport/2010/ The mini site has 5 pages: http://www-dev.allizom.org/fr/foundation/annualreport/2010/ http://www-dev.allizom.org/fr/foundation/annualreport/2010/ahead/ http://www-dev.allizom.org/fr/foundation/annualreport/2010/people/ http://www-dev.allizom.org/fr/foundation/annualreport/2010/opportunities/ http://www-dev.allizom.org/fr/foundation/annualreport/2010/faq/ Those pages are in your svn repository, so please "svn update" your local copy. Note that although we have merged and renamed our sites as 'mozilla.org', the repository is still named 'mozilla.com, here is the address as a reminder: https://svn.mozilla.org/projects/mozilla.com/trunk/fr There is a new associated .lang file for this section containing the UI strings for this mini-site as well as the strings describing resources such as videos, images and pdf files: https://svn.mozilla.org/projects/mozilla.com/trunk/fr/includes/l10n/foundationsection.lang (also visible on the langchecker and webdashboard: http://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~pascalc/langchecker/?locale=fr http://l10n.mozilla-community.org/webdashboard/?locale=fr ) There are videos on these pages and we are looking into solutions to integrate Universal Subtitles on mozilla.org, once this is working we will open separate bugs for the video subtitling (it is likely to happen at a later stage). A couple of pointers about technical US accounting terms: 990 Form http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRS_tax_forms#990 Audited Financial Statement http://www.investorwords.com/325/audited_financial_statements.html We will make this new mini-site live next Thursday, on October 6. It's a short deadline and we hope some locales can make it but of course, there is no problem in publishing pages after that date. Thanks!
Attached patch FAQ page (obsolete) — — Splinter Review
Attachment #563953 - Flags: review?(pascalc)
Comment on attachment 563953 [details] [diff] [review] FAQ page Propositions: Firefox continues to be a fundamental lever in driving the Web forward and advancing the Mozilla mission. Firefox poursuit son rôle stimulant pour repousser toujours plus loin les limites du Web et faire progresser la mission de Mozilla. -> Je suis pas sûr que 'lever' (levier) soit bien rendu par 'rôle stimulant' "Do you see a continued need for an independent player like Mozilla," "Est-ce que vous éprouvez toujours le besoin d'un acteur indépendant comme Mozilla" -> L'existence d'un acteur indépendant tel que Mozilla est-elle toujours nécessaire à présent que...
Attached patch AHEAD page (obsolete) — — Splinter Review
Attachment #563954 - Flags: review?(cedric.corazza)
Attached patch AHEAD page — — Splinter Review
Attachment #563954 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #563954 - Flags: review?(cedric.corazza)
Attachment #563958 - Flags: review?(cedric.corazza)
Attached patch FAQ page — — Splinter Review
Attachment #563953 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #563953 - Flags: review?(pascalc)
Attachment #563960 - Flags: review?(pascalc)
Attached patch PEOPLE page (obsolete) — — Splinter Review
Attachment #563971 - Flags: review?(cedric.corazza)
Comment on attachment 563958 [details] [diff] [review] AHEAD page Reviewed and committed : Revision 95674 propagated.
Attachment #563958 - Flags: review?(cedric.corazza) → review+
Comment on attachment 563960 [details] [diff] [review] FAQ page Reviewed and committed. Revision 95675 propagated.
Attachment #563960 - Flags: review?(pascalc) → review+
Comment on attachment 563971 [details] [diff] [review] PEOPLE page Reviewed and committed. Revision 95676 propagated.
Attachment #563971 - Flags: review?(cedric.corazza) → review+
Attachment #564049 - Flags: review?(cedric.corazza)
Attachment #564049 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #564049 - Flags: review?(cedric.corazza)
Attachment #564050 - Flags: review?(cedric.corazza)
Comment on attachment 564050 [details] [diff] [review] relecture de la trad de OPPORTUNITIES Committed in svn. Revision 95701.
Attachment #564050 - Flags: review?(cedric.corazza) → review+
Localization completed. Thanks to everyone.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reopening, we are going to rephrase some of the sentences :)
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
plusieurs chaînes dans le fichier .lang n'ont pas été traduites: http://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~pascalc/langchecker/?locale=fr
Modifications dans ce patch pour la page Opportunities positive > bénéfique espace > domaine reformulation d'une fin de paragraphe pour l'alléger. pour équipements mobiles et pour ordinateurs.> destinés aux équipements mobiles et ordinateurs.
Attachment #564799 - Flags: review?(pascalc)
quelques améliorations pour la page People
Attachment #563971 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #564804 - Flags: review?(pascalc)
Attachment #564805 - Flags: review?(pascalc)
Attachment #564804 - Flags: review?(pascalc) → review+
Comment on attachment 564799 [details] [diff] [review] prise en compte de plusieurs suggestions de Banban Review of attachment 564799 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- >pour ordinateur comme pour pour équipements mobiles je mets review + mais j'enlèverai le deuxième "pour"
Attachment #564799 - Flags: review?(pascalc) → review+
Comment on attachment 564805 [details] [diff] [review] finetuning de la page Faq Review of attachment 564805 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- "en tant que tel, et nous croyons" -> la virgule me semble de trop "numériques de plus en conscients et informés, il" -> de plus en plus Pareil, je mets r+ et j'applique avec ces changements
Attachment #564805 - Flags: review?(pascalc) → review+
màj envoyées en r95903
j'ai envoyé les màj du fichier fondationsection.lang que Clochix m'a fournies, le gros titre sur toutes les pages est vraiment à revoir, on se retrouve avec deux fois Rapport dans le titre!
proposition : Mozilla présente son RAPPORT ANNUEL
Attachment #564869 - Flags: review?(pascalc)
Attachment #564869 - Flags: review?(pascalc) → review+
We are now satisfied with the end result, closing, thank you all!
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago → 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Component: www.mozilla.org → General
Product: Websites → www.mozilla.org
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: