Update flash-check to reflect that Flash 11 is 10.6+ only

RESOLVED FIXED

Status

Camino Graveyard
Product Site
RESOLVED FIXED
6 years ago
6 years ago

People

(Reporter: Smokey Ardisson (offline for a while; not following bugs - do not email), Assigned: Smokey Ardisson (offline for a while; not following bugs - do not email))

Tracking

Details

Attachments

(1 attachment)

Now that Flash 11.0.1.152 is out, 10.5 users are apparently going to be stuck on 10.3.183.10, so we'll need to update flash-check to not prompt them to update to an incompatible version.  Yay!

(Also, when the first 11.0 0-day comes out, we're going to have to update the blocklisting code to not blocklist 10.3.183.10 for 10.5 users; should we go ahead and get a bug on file for that?)
Although in the bizarro world in which we live, it installs and runs[1] on 10.5 :O :P

[1] I've only tested http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/, in a debug build.
Created attachment 568826 [details] [diff] [review]
Teach flash-check about Flash 11

Stuart, can you double-check the changes here?  I think they're "right" and I've tested 10.5 and 10.6 by UA spoofing and twiddling the 10.4/10.5 required Flash version on stage: http://www-stage.caminobrowser.org/welcome/
Assignee: samuel.sidler → alqahira
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #568826 - Flags: review?(stuart.morgan+bugzilla)
Comment on attachment 568826 [details] [diff] [review]
Teach flash-check about Flash 11

>+// Returns true if the user is running at least 10.6.
>+// A false return only means that the user might be running something older,
>+// not that they definitely are.
>+function isSnowLeopardOrLater() {
>+  var osVersion = getMacOSVersion();
>+  if (osVersion)
>+    return osVersion[1] && (osVersion[1] >= 6);
>+  // If the version isn't available, check for a version of Flash that requires
>+  // 10.6+.
>+  var flashVersion = getFlashVersion();
>+  return flashVersion && (flashVersion[0] > 11);
>+}

Er, that last comparison needs to be either "> 10" or ">= 11" (we use "> 9" in the Flash comparison in isTigerOrLater, and ">= N" in the OS version comparisons; not sure why we do one check-type one way and the other another way).

Comment 4

6 years ago
Comment on attachment 568826 [details] [diff] [review]
Teach flash-check about Flash 11

sr=smorgan with tweaks.

>+const kLatest10_4_10_5FlashVersion = [10, 3, 183, 10];
> const kLatestPPCFlashVersion = [10, 1, 102, 64];

This ends up being a bit ambiguous. If I'm PPC 10.5, which constant applies to me? Lets call the new one kLatestPre10_6IntelFlashVersion, or kLatestIntel10_4_10_5FlashVersion.

>+  return flashVersion && (flashVersion[0] > 11);

Let's use >= everywhere.
Attachment #568826 - Flags: review?(stuart.morgan+bugzilla) → review+
Deployed, with kLatestIntel10_4_10_5FlashVersion and >= everywhere in isTigerOrLater / isSnowLeopardOrLater.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.