Closed
Bug 696658
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Review Revision page should contain revision comment
Categories
(support.mozilla.org :: Knowledge Base Software, task, P3)
support.mozilla.org
Knowledge Base Software
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
2014Q4
People
(Reporter: thomas.lendo, Assigned: safwan, Mentored)
Details
(Whiteboard: u=contributor c=wiki p=0 s=2014.22)
Attachments
(1 file)
For better understanding of the kind of changes at a glance, the Review Revision page should contain the revision comment(s) near the text "Reviewing Revision xyz by JaneDoe." at the top of the page. E.g. review page https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Firefox%20is%20already%20running%20but%20is%20not%20responding/review/17874 should contain Alice Wayman's comment for this revision and maybe all the other comments of unreviewed revisions till the current version. With that the reviewer can see what to expect without looking at the history page.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: u=contributor c=wiki p=1
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
+mentorbits
Whiteboard: u=contributor c=wiki p=1 → u=contributor c=wiki p=1 s=2013.backlog [mentor=r1cky][good first bug]
Updated•10 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P3
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Updated•10 years ago
|
Mentor: rrosario
Whiteboard: u=contributor c=wiki p=1 s=2013.backlog [mentor=r1cky][good first bug] → u=contributor c=wiki p=1 s=2013.backlog [good first bug]
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
If it's still in development, and being a [good first bug], I would like to work on it. Could you please explain what exactly to do?
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Here is how the review page looks today: http://note.io/1qkW24R Here is how it should look like: http://note.io/1qkVZ9b We are adding to that page the revision comment. We are also adding the information about revisions that have not been reviewed yet.
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
But these are not included in the development files. Right? Cause any search gives me search is unavailable. Also, do we need like reviewer account to view the development changes? Cause I can't see the page that atopal showed given the fact that I ain't a reviewer.
Flags: needinfo?(rrosario)
Flags: needinfo?(a.topal)
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Yeah, you need to to be a reviewer to see that. Regarding the other questions: I don't know, maybe Ricky can help, but he'll be on vacation for another week. Maybe this wasn't the best first bug.
Flags: needinfo?(a.topal)
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
I guess so :atopal :D
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
Any progress here?
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
Hope this fix the Issue! :)
Attachment #8533682 -
Flags: review?(rrosario)
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Landed on master: https://github.com/mozilla/kitsune/commit/a494c371ddde8e06287ca63977e73524817d4a8f
Flags: needinfo?(rrosario)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8533682 -
Flags: review?(rrosario) → review+
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Deployed to prod. Thank you Safwan!
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → safwan.rahman15
Whiteboard: u=contributor c=wiki p=1 s=2013.backlog [good first bug] → u=contributor c=wiki p=1 s=2014.22
Target Milestone: Future → 2014Q4
Updated•10 years ago
|
Whiteboard: u=contributor c=wiki p=1 s=2014.22 → u=contributor c=wiki p=0 s=2014.22
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
Thanks @r1cky and @mythmon for supporting me to fix the bug. Its really my pleasure. Topal, can you please verify if the patch really fix the issue? As I dont have reviewer power account, I can not check. Please check and verify this bug. :)
Flags: needinfo?(a.topal)
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
Thanks a lot for this, Safwan! There are two follow-ups. I have filed another bug for that: bug 1112507
Flags: needinfo?(a.topal)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•