Open
Bug 697799
Opened 12 years ago
Updated 12 years ago
Add Opera API for adding sidebars from websites
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Sidebar, defect)
SeaMonkey
Sidebar
Tracking
(Not tracked)
ASSIGNED
People
(Reporter: Manuel.Spam, Assigned: Manuel.Spam)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
8.51 KB,
patch
|
mnyromyr
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
To allow importing a sidebar into opera, a webmaster can use a link like this: <a href="http://domain.tld/sidebar.html" rel="sidebar" title="sidebar-title">... If we support this in SeaMonkey, nearly all panels, made for opera, should work with SeaMonkey, too. Probably this could even be a replacement for the existing API which gets less relevant as Firefox dropped it.
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Summary: SeaMonkey should Opera API for adding sidebars from websites → Add Opera API for adding sidebars from websites
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #570060 -
Flags: superreview?(mnyromyr)
Attachment #570060 -
Flags: review?(mnyromyr)
![]() |
||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Do you have a page with an Opera sidebar we can test this with?
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Philip Chee from comment #1) > Do you have a page with an Opera sidebar we can test this with? Opera sidebar directory: http://my.opera.com/community/customize/panel/directory/
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 570060 [details] [diff] [review] First patch >+function SidebarAddPanel(aTitle, aContentURL) It'd probably better to call it "SidebarAddLinkRelPanel" or "SidebarAddWebPanel". >+{ >+ // Check if URL is allowed in sidebar >+ if (!/(^https?:|^ftp:)/i.test(aContentURL)) >+ throw "Script attempted to add sidebar panel from illegal source"; Why are random *URLs* more secure than others? Why should it be more secure to not allow file: URLs? (Apart from Windows bugs.) It'd make more sense to run it past a scam test, etc. After all, we don't allow installation without confirmation anyway.
Attachment #570060 -
Flags: superreview?(neil)
Attachment #570060 -
Flags: superreview?(mnyromyr)
Attachment #570060 -
Flags: review?(mnyromyr)
Attachment #570060 -
Flags: review+
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 570060 [details] [diff] [review] First patch Sorry for the delay in the review, I've been busier than usual recently. The patch works well but I would appreciate a few tweaks as follows: >+ if (component == "navigator:browser" && event.button == 0 && Should we check for modifiers as well? >+ ceParams.linkNode.getAttribute("rel") == "sidebar" && >+ ceParams.linkNode.getAttribute("title")) { Use ceParams.linkNode.rel == "sidebar" && ceParams.linkNode.title (and title again on the next line) >+ stringBundle = Services.strings.createBundle("chrome://communicator/locale/sidebar/sidebar.properties"); >+ brandStringBundle = Services.strings.createBundle("chrome://branding/locale/brand.properties"); These should use <stringbundle> elements in the XUL (navigator.js defines gBrandBundle for brand.properties but you would have to create your own for sidebar.properties) and you probably don't need the try/catch any more. >+ dialogMessage = dialogMessage.replace(/%url%/, aContentURL); >+ dialogMessage = dialogMessage.replace(/%name%/, sidebarName); [We should really use getFormattedString for this, but that's a separate bug.] >+ Services.prompt.alert(null, titleMessage, dialogMessage); Use window for all prompts, since we actually have one now.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•