Closed
Bug 698275
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
Various cleanup in HTML element implementations
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)
Core
DOM: Core & HTML
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla11
People
(Reporter: Ms2ger, Assigned: Ms2ger)
References
(Depends on 1 open bug)
Details
(Whiteboard: [qa-])
Attachments
(1 file)
|
132.61 KB,
patch
|
mounir
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Various stuff that has been sitting in my queue for a while. Hope you like it.
Attachment #570550 -
Flags: review?(mounir)
Flags: in-testsuite-
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
Hi!
At first glance, from the MDN Dev Doc point-of-view, these are changes that do not change behavior. No doc will need to be updated because of this : is this correct?
Thx in advance.
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jean-Yves Perrier [:teoli] from comment #1)
> At first glance, from the MDN Dev Doc point-of-view, these are changes that
> do not change behavior. No doc will need to be updated because of this : is
> this correct?
Yes, this is only various cleanups, no behavioral change should happen.
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 570550 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v1
Review of attachment 570550 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
r=me with the comments addressed.
::: content/html/content/src/nsGenericHTMLElement.cpp
@@ +3594,5 @@
>
> bool
> nsGenericHTMLElement::IsCurrentBodyElement()
> {
> + // XXX Should this handle the case where GetBody returns a frameset?
Please do not add XXX comment. Put a TODO and file a bug (and put the bug number here of course :))
::: content/html/content/src/nsHTMLButtonElement.cpp
@@ -668,5 @@
> }
>
> return state;
> }
> -
You don't like those lines, do you?
::: content/html/content/src/nsHTMLFieldSetElement.cpp
@@ +62,5 @@
>
> nsHTMLFieldSetElement::~nsHTMLFieldSetElement()
> {
> PRUint32 length = mDependentElements.Length();
> + for (PRUint32 i = 0; i < length; ++i) {
Seems like most people want that horrible style... :(
::: content/html/content/src/nsHTMLFormElement.cpp
@@ +2021,4 @@
>
> + //
> + // Get the control / list of controls from the form using form["name"]
> + //
Could you remove those lines with "//" only?
@@ +2028,5 @@
> + }
> +
> + //
> + // If it's just a lone radio button, then select it.
> + //
Could you remove those lines with "//" only?
@@ +2037,5 @@
> + }
> + return NS_OK;
> + }
> + nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMNodeList> nodeList = do_QueryInterface(item);
> + if (nodeList) {
if (!nodeList) {
return NS_OK;
}
::: content/html/content/src/nsHTMLInputElement.cpp
@@ +1004,5 @@
>
> NS_IMETHODIMP
> nsHTMLInputElement::GetList(nsIDOMHTMLElement** aValue)
> {
> + *aValue = nsnull;
Add an empty line after this line.
@@ +1022,5 @@
> + return NS_OK;
> + }
> +
> + nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMHTMLElement> domElement = do_QueryInterface(element);
> + domElement.forget(aValue);
Do you really want to change:
CallQueryInterface(elem, aValue);
to this these two lines?
Do we want to prevent CallQueryInterface as much as possible?
@@ +1482,5 @@
> }
>
> + //
> + // For radio button, we need to do some extra fun stuff
> + //
Remove the lines with only "//".
@@ +1487,5 @@
> + if (aChecked) {
> + return RadioSetChecked(aNotify);
> + }
> +
> + if (nsIRadioGroupContainer* container = GetRadioGroupContainer()) {
Assigning in a condition is ugly... Please do that instead:
nsIRadioGroupContainer* container = GetRadioGroupContainer();
if (container) {
/* foo */
}
/* bar*/
@@ +1521,5 @@
> //
> // Let the group know that we are now the One True Radio Button
> //
> + nsresult rv = NS_OK;
> + if (nsIRadioGroupContainer* container = GetRadioGroupContainer()) {
ditto
@@ +1643,5 @@
> {
> + if (mType != NS_FORM_INPUT_FILE) {
> + return nsGenericHTMLElement::Focus();
> + }
> + // for file inputs, focus the button instead
Leave an empty line before this comment and put an uppercase at the beginning of the comment and a dot at the end.
@@ +1644,5 @@
> + if (mType != NS_FORM_INPUT_FILE) {
> + return nsGenericHTMLElement::Focus();
> + }
> + // for file inputs, focus the button instead
> + if (nsIFrame* frame = GetPrimaryFrame()) {
No assignments in conditions, please.
@@ +1646,5 @@
> + }
> + // for file inputs, focus the button instead
> + if (nsIFrame* frame = GetPrimaryFrame()) {
> + nsIFrame* childFrame = frame->GetFirstPrincipalChild();
> + while (childFrame) {
I believe this could be a for loop instead:
for (nsIFrame* childFrame = frame->GetFirstPrincipalChild(); childFrame; childFrame = childFrame->GetNextSibling();) {
}
@@ +1654,5 @@
> + if (formCtrl && formCtrl->GetType() == NS_FORM_INPUT_BUTTON) {
> + nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMElement> element = do_QueryInterface(formCtrl);
> + nsIFocusManager* fm = nsFocusManager::GetFocusManager();
> + if (fm && element)
> + fm->SetFocus(element, 0);
Keep the style like this:
if (foo) {
bar;
}
::: content/html/content/src/nsHTMLMediaElement.cpp
@@ +2506,5 @@
> nsIContent* nsHTMLMediaElement::GetNextSource()
> {
> + nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMNode> thisDomNode = do_QueryObject(this);
> +
> + mSourceLoadCandidate = nsnull;
I do not see the point in this change... having |thisDomNode| and |mSourceLoadCandidate| being set before or after |rv| doesn't change anything here.
::: content/html/content/src/nsHTMLSelectElement.cpp
@@ +1234,5 @@
> NS_IMETHODIMP
> nsHTMLSelectElement::SetValue(const nsAString& aValue)
> {
> + PRUint32 length;
> + nsresult rv = GetLength(&length);
Could you put an empty line before this line.
@@ +1235,5 @@
> nsHTMLSelectElement::SetValue(const nsAString& aValue)
> {
> + PRUint32 length;
> + nsresult rv = GetLength(&length);
> + NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, rv);
And an empty line after this one.
@@ +1243,2 @@
>
> + if (NS_SUCCEEDED(rv) && node) {
if (NS_FAILED(rv) || !node) {
continue;
}
would be better
@@ +1246,2 @@
>
> + if (option) {
if (!option) {
continue;
}
@@ +1251,2 @@
>
> + if (optionVal.Equals(aValue)) {
You could use continue here too but it would be less useful than for the other two.
@@ +1919,4 @@
> {
> + switch (aType) {
> + case VALIDITY_STATE_VALUE_MISSING: {
> + nsXPIDLString message;
Keep:
switch (foo) {
case BAR: {
}
case FOOBAR: {
}
}
::: content/html/content/src/nsHTMLStyleElement.cpp
@@ +177,2 @@
> }
> + return ss->GetDisabled(aDisabled);
Could you add an empty line before this line.
@@ +187,2 @@
> }
> + return ss->SetDisabled(aDisabled);
Could you add an empty line before this line.
::: content/html/content/src/nsHTMLTableElement.cpp
@@ +391,5 @@
> + if (caption) {
> + return caption.forget();
> + }
> + }
> + return NULL;
nsnull maybe?
@@ +540,2 @@
>
> + if (nsRefPtr<nsIDOMHTMLTableSectionElement> head = GetTHead()) {
Please, don't do that...
@@ +589,2 @@
>
> + if (nsRefPtr<nsIDOMHTMLTableSectionElement> foot = GetTFoot()) {
ditto
::: content/html/content/src/nsHTMLTextAreaElement.cpp
@@ -1566,5 @@
> UpdateBarredFromConstraintValidation();
>
> nsGenericHTMLFormElement::FieldSetDisabledChanged(aNotify);
> }
> -
I liked those empty lines at the end of files :(
Attachment #570550 -
Flags: review?(mounir) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mounir Lamouri (:volkmar) (:mounir) from comment #3)
> Comment on attachment 570550 [details] [diff] [review] [diff] [details] [review]
> @@ +1022,5 @@
> > + return NS_OK;
> > + }
> > +
> > + nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMHTMLElement> domElement = do_QueryInterface(element);
> > + domElement.forget(aValue);
>
> Do you really want to change:
> CallQueryInterface(elem, aValue);
> to this these two lines?
>
> Do we want to prevent CallQueryInterface as much as possible?
I prefer this style, but it doesn't matter much, I guess. Your call.
> ::: content/html/content/src/nsHTMLSelectElement.cpp
> @@ +1234,5 @@
> > NS_IMETHODIMP
> > nsHTMLSelectElement::SetValue(const nsAString& aValue)
> > {
> > + PRUint32 length;
> > + nsresult rv = GetLength(&length);
>
> Could you put an empty line before this line.
Haven't done this, to keep the declaration next to its getter.
Addressed your other comments.
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ms2ger from comment #4)
> (In reply to Mounir Lamouri (:volkmar) (:mounir) from comment #3)
> > Comment on attachment 570550 [details] [diff] [review] [diff] [details] [review] [diff] [details] [review]
> > @@ +1022,5 @@
> > > + return NS_OK;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMHTMLElement> domElement = do_QueryInterface(element);
> > > + domElement.forget(aValue);
> >
> > Do you really want to change:
> > CallQueryInterface(elem, aValue);
> > to this these two lines?
> >
> > Do we want to prevent CallQueryInterface as much as possible?
>
> I prefer this style, but it doesn't matter much, I guess. Your call.
Let's not change the blame then.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [qa-]
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla11
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•