Closed
Bug 699721
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Include JSCompartment::typeLifoAlloc in TI memory reporting
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: n.nethercote, Assigned: n.nethercote)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Whiteboard: [MemShrink:P2])
DMD just told me this while loading Gmail: Unreported: 614,400 (cumulative: 13,347,230) bytes in 150 heap block(s) in record 11 of 16459: Requested bytes unreported: 614,400 / 614,400 Slop bytes unreported: 0 / 0 at 0x402A063: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:263) by 0x809229D: js_malloc (Utility.h:166) by 0x80922D4: js::detail::BumpChunk::new_(unsigned long) (LifoAlloc.cpp:54) by 0x809275E: js::LifoAlloc::getOrCreateChunk(unsigned long) (LifoAlloc.cpp:180) by 0x81AC7C7: js::analyze::ScriptAnalysis::analyzeBytecode(JSContext*) (LifoAlloc.h:230) by 0x7EEE7B8: JSScript::makeAnalysis(JSContext*) (jsinfer.cpp:5507) by 0x7EF306A: JSScript::ensureRanAnalysis(JSContext*, JSFunction*, JSObject*) (jsinferinlines.h:1270) by 0x7F21EDF: js::types::TypeMonitorCall(JSContext*, js::CallArgs const&, bool) (jsinferinlines.h:327) There was another 300KB+ in similar records. Looks like JSCompartment::typeLifoAlloc isn't accounted for. Should be easy to add. It should probably go under "analysis-temporary".
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
All analysis-temporary measures is the size of typeLifoAlloc, is that computation being done incorrectly?
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
Hmm, I'll have to investigate more. Some JS code runs between the analysis-temporary recorder running and DMD doing its final analysis, that might be the cause, though 600KB seems like a lot.
Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [MemShrink] → [MemShrink:P2]
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
Ok, this turned out to be bone-headedness on my part: in my private version of Firefox that has DMD annotations, I failed to annotate the TI reporters. Duh.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•