Closed Bug 70128 Opened 25 years ago Closed 25 years ago

Inconsistency between the use of "news server" and "newsgroup server"

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: MailNews: Account Configuration, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED FIXED
mozilla0.9.2

People

(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: stephend)

Details

Attachments

(11 files)

4.21 KB, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
4.21 KB, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
1.97 KB, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
994 bytes, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
13.73 KB, image/gif
Details
9.97 KB, image/gif
Details
10.59 KB, image/gif
Details
5.12 KB, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
5.07 KB, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
7.46 KB, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
4.21 KB, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Under Account Settings we say: Server Type: Newsgroup server (NNTP) in Account Wizard we say: ...of your news (NNTP) server. and in Congratulations! of the Account Wizard we say: News Server Name: Could we agree on: Newsgroup server (NNTP) ?
Good catch, I'll take this. Robin, Jennifer, when we agree on the wording, I'll provide the patches.
Assignee: racham → stephend
QA Contact: esther → nbaca
accepting bug. changing to all.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Hardware: PC → All
Robin's call on which is better. Thanks for catching/fixing this.
I agree with gemal@gemal.dk that we should consistently use "Newsgroup server (NNTP)".
What about the first page of the Account Wizard, where the following text appears: "Newsgroup account". I think it might be fine to leave this alone, but I just wanted to double check.
I think "Newsgroup account" is fine as is, because we're describing the type of account, not the type of server.
Good, then my patch should be fine, the only thing I changed related to that is in the window where you enter a name for the account, I changed the following: -<!ENTITY accnameExample.label "For example, Work Account, Home Account or News Account"> +<!ENTITY accnameExample.label "For example, Work Account, Home Account or Newsgroup Account"> Bhuvan and Seth, please r/sr. Thanks.
Review/Super Review for this, please. Thanks.
r=hewitt
well, I should say that in the past we removed NNTP from the UI since that's pretty meaningless for most users, and a bit confusing. But if the UI people have no objections, sr=bienvenu
Sorry for the delayed comments.... I feel "News Server" and "News Account" are better than "Newsgroup Server" and "Newsgroup Account" respectively. Newsgroup Account sounds like an account created for a Newsgroup which doesn't sound right. Also, Newsgroup is one of the items of a news server and promoting it to associate with server and account doesn't look right. Robin/Jennifer, any thoughts ?
imo Newsgroup Server is wrong.
At the midnight hour, before I committed this patch to the CVS server, I had a realization, which Bhuvan and I discussed. Newsgroup server is singular, which sounds like you'd have only one newsgroup. I'm sure this bug was filed by you, Henrik, because of the other references throughout Mail/News to (SMTP) being in the description accompanying "outgoing mail server." Obviously, that is another bug, but to remain consistent in the product we have to agree on when to include the acronyms for these server labels. Since I currently own this, I don't feel it's correct to checkin the current patch based on my reasoning above. Comments welcome!
I would prefer something like "News Server (NNTP)".
I like "News Server (NNTP)" and "News Account" (no NNTP needed).
You'll notice this patch is much smaller, because there were instances in our pref code where News Account already existed correctly, so no patching was needed for those cases. Also, to remain consistent, I'd like to re-open bug 70241, and fix instances of "Outgoing (STMP) Server" to reflect this format, "Outgoing Server (SMTP)" Let me know. Thanks to all.
Patch looks good. r=walk84
Need the sr= now, I'd also like to get feedback for the issue that I brought up about bug 70241.
Keywords: patch, review, ui
r=racham
I think "Outgoing Server (SMTP)" will also be a good change.
Agree: "Outgoing Server (SMTP)"
sr=mscott
Fix checked in. Thanks to all!
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
A bit confused: Account creation has: "news server (NNTP)" at Server Information "News Server Name" at Congratulation Account Settings has: "Newsgroup server (NNTP)" at Server Settings Where's the consistency...?
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
I left it that way on purpose. NNTP is not needed everywhere, I felt it was only needed for the stages where the user was inputting server information.
This patch just keeps the Congratulations! screen in line with the other changes that I made a while back to the Account Wizard. Jennifer and Robin, do these changes jive?
OK by me.
Asa, this is a simple wording change, it couldn't harm a flea (but it helps with consistency.) Is it possible to get this a=drivers@mozilla.org ?
are you asking for approval for 0.8.1? there is no need to get this into 0.8.1, just land it on the trunk.
Checked in.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Build 2001-04-02-04: NT4 Reopening. I agree with Henrik and believe there should more more consistency. 1. Account Wizard a. First dialog: states "Newsgroup account". - I think it should state "News Account". At this stage a newsgroup is not being created. b. Server Information dialog: states "Enter the name of your news server name (NNTP)....". - Could this be changed to state "Enter your News Server Name (NNTP)...." or "Enter your news server name (NNTP)...." c. Congratulations dialog: states "News Server (NTTP) Name" - I think it should state "News Server Name (NNTP)" 2. Account Settings a. News Server panel: For the Server Type entry it states "Newsgroup Server (NNTP)". - I think it should state "News Server (NNTP)"
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
No problem. New patch coming up in a bit.
What should we do about: <!ENTITY incomingServerNameDesc.label "Enter the name of your incoming server (for example, &quot;pop.example.net&quot;)."> since this doesn't match with what we'd like to change SMTP and NNTP to: <!ENTITY smtpServerDesc.label "Enter your outgoing mail server name (SMTP) (for example, &quot;smtp.example.net&quot;).">
| What is the name of your incoming mail server? | _________________________________ | [_________________________________] | Example: mail.mozilla.org We can't include `(POP)' or `(IMAP)' in that text, because we don't know which it is until the user chooses the appropriate radio button immediately above, and changing the text based on the radio button would make the UI look unstable. | What is the name of your outgoing mail (SMTP) server? | _________________________________ | [_________________________________] | Example: smtp.mozilla.org Don't use `outgoing mail server name (SMTP)', because `SMTP' is a type of server -- it's not a type of server name! Similarly, use `News (NNTP) Server Name', not `News Server Name (NNTP)' -- because `NNTP' is a type of server, it's not a type of server name. And yes, stephend, I know that phrasing the items as questions is inconsistent with the rest of the UI; but it's the rest of the UI which is wrong (according to both Mac OS and Windows UI guidelines), and fixing it all is is the sort of bug you're good at. :-) (File bugs on yourself and CC me if you want suggestions for the rest of the wording. Get Hakan to help you, if necessary, where you need to indent/align/remove UI elements.)
Note: The patch only addresses a few of your comments, MPT. The rest as you say, might need help from Hwaara, Seth or Bhuvan.
>... > +<!ENTITY newsServer.label "News (NTTP) Server"> >... > +<!ENTITY newsServerNamePrefix.label "News (NTTP) Server Name:"> >... > +<!ENTITY newsServerNameDesc.label "Enter the name of your news (NTTP) server > (for example, &quot;news.example.net&quot;)."> It's `NNTP', not `NTTP'. :-) > -<!ENTITY nntpType.label "News Server"> > +<!ENTITY nntpType.label "News (NNTP) Server"> IMO, it's not necessary to give the technical term in the summary information on the last page.
Stephen, screen shots #2 and #3 have a typo - should say NNTP (instead of NTTP). Thanks.
Apologies; this is already noted in mpt's last comment.
Great catch, I must've been asleep in the editor I was using ;-). Okay, I'll correct those and nix the technical stuff at the congrats screen. Thanks!
Until we can agree on implementing MPT's suggestion, do people like how I've currently implemented the wording in the latest patch?
MPT said: "IMO, it's not necessary to give the technical term in the summary information on the last page." My first impulse is to say that consistency is less distracting, and that we should go either one way or another. Is NNTP even necessary? Granted, I think it may help users if their ISP gives them an "NNTP" address, labeling it such, for users to know what info to plug in where. But I think I'm leaning towards consistency one way or another. As for the term "Newsgroups", I agree that it is not synonymous with "News Server" at all, and should be used only when the user is actually dealing with newsgroups by definition. "News account" says just as much to the reader as "Newsgroup account", and it's less confusing and more consistent to boot. Further comments on the last patch: <!ENTITY imapServer.label "IMAP Mail server"> The above needs to be "IMAP Mail Server" to match the rest (there's one near the bottom that is capped). It seems that initial (headline) capitalization is the way it's mostly done now so my impulse is to follow that. If someone thinks we shouldn't initial cap, now's the time to say so, but it would probalby involve a lot less to stick with initial capping. <!ENTITY webmail.label "Web mail account"> This should be WebMail, to match the Netscape client to which it refers, no? <!ENTITY emailPrefix.label "Email Address:"> This is Netscape style, but I don't like it. I don't see a reason to kill the hyphen other than popular misuse on the Internet. I'm working on the Mozilla style (check out Bug 71919 if you're interested) now, and if you want to voice your opinions on it here, I'll take the results of that discussion to that bug. Steve Rudman agrees that Mozilla style doesn't have to be Netscape style, and so I think we should make Mozilla style decisions based on Mozilla.org needs, not Netscape needs. -<!ENTITY smtpServerNamePrefix.label "Outgoing Server (SMTP) Name:"> Does what MPT said above apply here, too? Or is there no radio button choice there? Quoting MPT: "We can't include `(POP)' or `(IMAP)' in that text, because we don't know which it is until the user chooses the appropriate radio button immediately above, and changing the text based on the radio button would make the UI look unstable." By the way, please feel free to CC: me on any and all bugs like this, I'm a professional editor of technical books so this stuff is what I deal with all day. Not that my perspective is more important than anyone else's, but I have a "different" perspective to offer. Plus, I want to know about all these types of style bugs for Bug 71919 (I think it's a metabug, so I didn't add dependency to this one, although I considered it). James
James, thanks for the comments. To answer your question regarding: -<!ENTITY smtpServerNamePrefix.label "Outgoing Server (SMTP) Name:"> Does what MPT said above apply here, too? Or is there no radio button choice there? Quoting MPT: "We can't include `(POP)' or `(IMAP)' in that text, because we don't know which it is until the user chooses the appropriate radio button immediately above, and changing the text based on the radio button would make the UI look unstable." No, there is no radio button. This is in the aw-done.dtd file, where we say "Congratulations!" to the user, showing him/her the settings that we've stored for them. It's always going to be the SMTP/outgoing value here.
I can check this in, if someone reviews it (an sr=) would be easy enough for such a trivial patch. Comments, anyone?
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9 → mozilla0.9.2
Status: REOPENED → ASSIGNED
I have one comment: that's "WebMail" not "Webmail". Everything else looks perfect to me. Has this been checked in yet? James
Better patch coming up. James, if Mozilla wants to have "e-mail" instead of "email" as Netscape has it, a new patch will have to be provided. In the hopes of correcting the other inconsistencies and getting this in time for the localization freeze, please review the new patch. Thanks.
+<!ENTITY smtpServerTitle.label "Outgoing (SMTP) Server"> extra space in there? otherwise, seems fine to me. sr=sspitzer robinf, jglick or nbaca would be an appropriate reviewer.
Okay, removed that space, thanks for the sanity check. Robin, please review one last time, and this should finally be done ;-) Thanks to all!
I remember I have an r=robinf@netscape.com with the condition that I go back to the style before on "email" instead of the syntax "e-mail", so in the patch I attached, I have left those intact. Will check in the fix when the tree opens.
Fix checked in. Thanks to all.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
this is what we got now: NEWS: in the prefs: ------------- - "Server Type: Newsgroup server (NNTP)" - "Server Name:" - in the middle of text "news (NNTP) server" Creating new profile: --------------------- - in the middle of text "news (NNTP) server" - "News Server Name:" seems ok...
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: