Closed Bug 70442 Opened 24 years ago Closed 22 years ago

[RFE] No option to enable passive ftp-transfer

Categories

(Core Graveyard :: Networking: FTP, enhancement)

x86
Windows NT
enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 465
Future

People

(Reporter: whistler, Assigned: dougt)

Details

(Keywords: verifyme)

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; 0.9) Gecko/20010227

there is no option to enable passive ftp transfers (trough firewalls)

(is there passive ftp at all?)

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Firewall that enforces passive ftp-transfers

Actual Results:  no connection / mozilla crashes

Expected Results:  Download the selected file

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 465 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
One of the comments on bug 465 :
Mozilla tries pasv and port commands. if one fails, the other is attempted.
qa to me.
VERIFIED: duplicate

We do only passive in Mozilla now. If this is still a crash, please update here
and reopen bug.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
QA Contact: tever → benc
making and RFE
Severity: trivial → enhancement
Status: VERIFIED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Summary: No option to enable passive ftp-transfer → [RFE] No option to enable passive ftp-transfer
Target Milestone: --- → Future
benc@netscape.com: 
Why have you reopen this bug ?
If my duping is wrong then mark this bug new (if possible)
The other bug was changed so it described the current problem: this does not
work and will not work in the near future. That bug needs to be release noted
and the discussion can focus on the present.

This bug is for anyone that wants to add this feature, how to implement it, why
it should be added, etc. Eventually someone in a firewalled environment will
demand we add this feature.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
QA Contact: benc → tever
This bug is invalid.  mozilla only supports PASV.  it does not support PORT.  If 
it did, there would be a requirement to have some kind of preference.  
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago23 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
QA Contact: tever → benc
VERIFIED:
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
REOPEN:
going to dupe back to 465 to get duplicate counts right.
Status: VERIFIED → REOPENED
Resolution: INVALID → ---
RESOLVED/DUPE:
The original rfe was re-opened recently.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 465 ***
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago22 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
reporter: If bug 465 is what you want, can you mark this VERIFIED?
Keywords: verifyme
I saw the word "crash" in the problem description. If you know who your firewall
vendor was, I'd like to know. 
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.