Open
Bug 705299
Opened 14 years ago
Updated 7 years ago
Provide Mozilla emails to the active volunteers
Categories
(mozilla.org :: Governance, task)
mozilla.org
Governance
Tracking
(Not tracked)
ASSIGNED
People
(Reporter: Debloper, Assigned: mrz)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [FEASIBILITY])
Let's start recognizing volunteer Mozillians upon their active-dedication towards the community by giving out mozilla.net email ID for them. Not a status symbol, but it'll be a symbol of trust and the badge of hard-works for Mozilla, which they can use for the Mozilla specific purposes, officially.
The criteria of deserving, managing body, applying/vouching SOP etc. need to be decided.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [FEASIBILITY]
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
I think it's a great idea to look into how we could provide Mozilla email addresses to active contributors, but I don't think we know which address would make sense at this point. For instance, it might make sense to have @mozillians.org emails for people and use the phonebook profiles to identify contributors.
Summary: Provide @mozilla.net email ID to the active and hardworking volunteers → Provide Mozilla emails to the active volunteers
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Boswell from comment #1)
> ...it might make sense to have @mozillians.org emails for people...
Sure, it can definitely be a more general way to start with.
Given the member-traffic, it'll be a good sandbox to probe the contributor's dedication towards Mozilla, if the next step has to be decided (later).
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
David how about mozilla-community.org ?
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to arky from comment #3)
> David how about mozilla-community.org ?
I think we should consider this option too. IMO, figuring out the right email address to use isn't the blocker right now though.
For next steps, we want to establish a new policy for giving Mozilla email addresses out (who gets them, how are they managed, etc) and then we can sort out what address to use.
Considering this, we should craft a post to the governance list with reasons why we should do this and ideas about what the policy would look like.
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
And to follow up on my previous comment, any post to the governance list should take into account the current policy around mozilla.org email addresses documented at
http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2005/02/24/email-addresses-mozillaorg-and-the-mozilla-foundation/
AFAIK, that's the last official word on the matter. There may be a thread in the goverance post that has more details around this -- if someone has a chance to dig that up that would be helpful.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Boswell from comment #4)
> (In reply to arky from comment #3)
> > David how about mozilla-community.org ?
> ...
> For next steps, we want to establish a new policy for giving Mozilla email
> addresses out (who gets them, how are they managed, etc) and then we can
> sort out what address to use.
Exactly - that's the 2nd paragraph of my bug-description!
My suggestion is:
1. those who think they matter to the community, ask & get a @mozillian.org mail
2. the ones, whom the community thinks are important, gets an @mozilla.net mail
Let me know if we need to take this discussion to wiki/moPad/IRC-meeting.
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Debloper from comment #6)
> Exactly - that's the 2nd paragraph of my bug-description!
:)
> Let me know if we need to take this discussion to wiki/moPad/IRC-meeting.
Starting an etherpad to work on a draft post to the governance list sounds like a good idea. Could you set that up, link to it here and add any notes and ideas you have there? I can take a pass at things there too.
Comment 8•14 years ago
|
||
+1 for the general idea of giving contributors email addresses as a small token of appreciation. :Jeway, a contributor, asked for this today in #identity.
It seems like a simple email forwarding service + of course a Persona IdP would be a reasonable start..
| Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → mrz
| Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 10•13 years ago
|
||
Community IT are working on it! When the team is properly setup, I'll ask a few volunteers to create a workflow and drop it here.
Comment 11•13 years ago
|
||
I'm moving this to our component, simply because its a project that were planning and getting up and running
I head that you spoke about this in the reps council meeting, maybe we need to discuss what you thought over an IRC chat, Deb?
Also dropping this to normal priority. There's no reason for this to take a priority above our other projects.
We're in the stages of setting up a workforce to get this going. I'll keep this bug updated with our stages of progress.
Severity: major → normal
Component: Contributor Engagement → Server Operations: Community IT
Product: Mozilla Communities → mozilla.org
QA Contact: mrz
Version: unspecified → other
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
Moving over to new Community IT components.
Component: Server Operations: Community IT → Community IT: Hosting
Product: mozilla.org → Infrastructure & Operations
Comment 14•11 years ago
|
||
Mozilla.org emails would look better
Comment 15•11 years ago
|
||
I think we're safe, at this point, to close as incomplete? There have been a number of dead end discussions, and we are providing mozilla branded emails at a regional level.
Unless anybody objects today, I'm going to close this. Until we have a decision from governance that means we can provide mozilla.org/net/com/something, there's not a whole lot for IT to do.
HOWEVER
.community was recently launched. We could consider mozilla.community email addresses... (I'm actually going to file to see if webops want to try registering that... It seems like a domain that could be useful at some point and is currently available)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 16•11 years ago
|
||
A "closed" bug means it's no longer an open item. IMO it's not a closed issue but merely pending governance, which I think it stalled.
Comment 17•11 years ago
|
||
:mrz,
Maybe this should be moved to mozilla.org :: governance then? It's not an IT thing at this point, and hasn't been for a long time
| Assignee | ||
Comment 18•11 years ago
|
||
Perhaps. I'm not sure why it's part of Community IT anyways. I started the initial wiki pages but punted this over to ReMo & others for policy setting. Since @mozilla.org is managed by Mozilla (Corp), implementation is (currently) outside the scope of Community IT.
Component: Community IT: Hosting → Governance
Product: Infrastructure & Operations → mozilla.org
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•