Build: 2001-02-28-15-Mtrunk(WIN), 2001-02-28-09-trunk(MAC), not tested on Linux, but I can see regus.xpi in the nscp-xpi subdirectory 1. Install 2001-02-28 build (make it simple by installing Navigator only) 2. Open any update.html such as ftp://sweetlou/products/client/seamonkey/windows/32bit/x86/2001-02-27-13-Mtrunk/ update.html for Windows 3. Update Navigator, Cartman, and Aol on Desktop to match a Navigator only install from the install wizard RESULT: Different things have happened. You may crash during update. You may complete install, but upon restarting the browser menus may be incomplete. A closer look at the install.log reveals that regus.xpi was not installed. For WinNT, I manually installed regus.xpi followed by running the update.html as described in step #3. Upon completing the update, restarting Netscape appears to show that everything upgraded successfully. Therefore, it appears that this may be the reason for the failed installation using update.html only. For Mac, restarting after running update.html appears to look normal. But I know that regus.xpi was not installed (checking install.log). This one is tricky because this is an incomplete upgrade even though everything appears "normal". These are the ones that can slip by if I'm not awake. EXPECTED RESULT: regus.xpi should be installed when update.html is used to upgrade to a new build. If update.html is going to be used for internal testing, we need this page to be maintained as related changes are made. It's risky for QA to promote within if this page is not maintained to match changes made to the xpi packages.
Nominating for beta. XPInstall QA uses this update.html as a tool for testing upgrades. We need this tool to accurately represent a real upgrade scenario.
have to do it.
Assignee: dbragg → dveditz
Severity: major → blocker
Keywords: nsbeta1 → nsbeta1+
Priority: -- → P1
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.8.1
Assign to me if you'd like me to take it!
Ok, you've got it. Thanks! I guess regus.xpi should be added to the special-cased "browser" files that don't get a separate checkbox, since the browser won't run correctly without it.
Assignee: dveditz → tao
Hi, folks: Mind to give r/sr on the patch above?
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Whiteboard: pending for r,sr
fixed in 61626's patches.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Build: 2001-03-06-11-Mtrunk(WIN), 2001-03-06-10-trunk(MAC) Back to normal. Most excellent! Marking Verified!
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.