8 years ago
Attachment #584562 - Attachment mime type: text/plain → text/html
8 years ago
OS: Windows 7 → All
Priority: -- → P3
Hardware: x86_64 → All
Regression window: Works; http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/c0dbdafa583c Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0b8pre) Gecko/20101104 Firefox/4.0b8pre ID:20101104134944 Fails: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/52a6a18eeb61 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0b8pre) Gecko/20101104 Firefox/4.0b8pre ID:20101104165457 Pushlog: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=c0dbdafa583c&tochange=52a6a18eeb61 Triggered by: ed0befc22bb7 Ehsan Akhgari — Bug 389321 - Part 3: Use a centralized algorithm for caret positioning; r=roc a=blocking-betaN+
So presumably the only reason the newline doesn't show up the first time is due to the frame-construction-time whitespace frame suppression?
My guess (untested) would be that this is another regression from bug 389321, and likely a duplicate of one of the existing regressions from it.
> My guess (untested) would be that this is another regression from bug 389321, Comment 1 says so too, based on a bisect.
This seems to be the code responsible for this bug: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ed0befc22bb7#l15.12
(In reply to Boris Zbarsky (:bz) from comment #2) > So presumably the only reason the newline doesn't show up the first time is > due to the frame-construction-time whitespace frame suppression? I think this is the reason, since the code in question doesn't get run the first time that the document is reflown. Can you please point me to the code responsible for the whitespace frame suppression? Why don't we do the same thing on the future reflows?
It's an optimization that happens at frame construction time. When you assign to the node data, we undo the optimization ... it's simpler than trying to keep it optimized through dynamic changes.
Do we undo the optimization only for the textframe that changed? Note that in this case, the textframe before the <p> element (containing a "\n") triggers this bug.
(In reply to Ehsan Akhgari [:ehsan] from comment #8) > Do we undo the optimization only for the textframe that changed? Yes. The optimization really has nothing to do with this though.
Here's a testcase where the empty-textframe optimization never kicks in (because the whitespace-only text node between the <li> and <p> is not adjacent to a block element boundary), which shows the bug.
Oh, I figured out the problem. This change had snuck its way into the patch for bug 389321. It's not needed, and reverting it fixes this bug.
Assignee: nobody → ehsan
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #584982 - Flags: review?(roc)
Duplicate of this bug: 697793
Attachment #584982 - Flags: review?(roc) → review+
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla12
Try run for 33568bb15cbb is complete. Detailed breakdown of the results available here: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=33568bb15cbb Results (out of 222 total builds): exception: 5 success: 187 warnings: 26 failure: 4 Builds (or logs if builds failed) available at: http://email@example.com Timed out after 06 hours without completing.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Duplicate of this bug: 735554
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.