Closed Bug 714654 Opened 14 years ago Closed 14 years ago

[Collector] Allow installation of incompatible extensions in a collection when appropriate

Categories

(addons.mozilla.org Graveyard :: Collector Extension, defect, P2)

BW-2.0
defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED
BW-2.1

People

(Reporter: Mathnerd314, Assigned: mackers)

Details

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0a1) Gecko/20120102 Firefox/12.0a1 Build ID: 20120102031055 Steps to reproduce: 1. Get Nightly 2. Install Addon Compatibility Reporter 3. Install Addon Collector 4. Follow a collection with incompatible addons 5. Addon Manager -> Collection -> The collection Actual results: No way to install incompatible addons Expected results: Button saying "Install anyway"
I should have mentioned: the extensions are incompatible because their maxVersion fields are too low.
Assignee: nobody → dave
Priority: -- → P2
Target Milestone: --- → BW-2.1
Version: 2.0 → BW-2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Summary: Allow installation of incompatible extensions in a collection when appropriate → [Collector] Allow installation of incompatible extensions in a collection when appropriate
This bug is actually about supporting compat-by-default in the collector. Support for compat-by-default in the collector has now been added in r99898. All* "incompatible" add-ons can now be installed by the collector (regardless of whether ACR is installed). * Except add-ons that: - have maxVersion < 4.0 (or whatever extensions.minCompatibleAppVersion/extensions.minCompatiblePlatformVersion is set to) - are not type = extension - have binary components - are on the blacklist - have been individually marked as strictly compatible
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
I did some light testing and everything seems to work as described in comment 2, but I have just one query: (In reply to David McNamara [:mackers] from comment #2) > All* "incompatible" add-ons can now be installed by the collector > (regardless of whether ACR is installed). > > * Except add-ons that: > - have binary components Can you point me to a collection that has such an add-on - not compatible with say beta or aurora and has a binary component.
(In reply to Brian King (Briks) [:kinger] from comment #3) > Can you point me to a collection that has such an add-on - not compatible > with say beta or aurora and has a binary component. I can't find anything like this of the top of my head, but the binary part is an unknown to the collector. Here is the implemented behaviour: Add-on compatible with 4.0, without binary component: collector lists as installable, AOM allows installation. Add-on compatible with 4.0, but with binary component: collector lists as installable, AOM blocks installation.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Product: addons.mozilla.org → addons.mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.