Closed
Bug 722494
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
add 10.7 build things graphserver
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: jhford, Assigned: jhford)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
|
6.79 KB,
patch
|
mozilla
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Need to add 10.7 build machines to graph server. I am using the same OS ID as the Talos machines, let me know if this is a problem. I generated this patch using the following python:
for bt in ['', '_leak_test']:
for branch in ['tracemonkey', 'places', 'electrolysis', 'maple', 'cedar', 'birch', 'graphics', 'jaegermonkey', 'build-system', 'services-central', 'devtools', 'mozilla-central', 'mozilla-beta', 'mozilla-aurora', 'fx-team', 'alder', 'holly', 'larch', 'ux', 'ionmonkey', 'profiling']:
print 'insert into machines values (NULL,22,0,NULL,"OS_X_10.7_%s%s",1,unix_timestamp());' % (branch, bt)
Attachment #592864 -
Flags: review?(catlee)
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 592864 [details]
add 10.7 build machines to graphs db
lgtm. this is the first time we're sharing the os_id between a builder and tester, but I think that's ok. maybe poke rhelmer to be sure.
Attachment #592864 -
Flags: review?(catlee) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 592864 [details]
add 10.7 build machines to graphs db
Rob, any thoughts on sharing the os_id between the 'builder' pseudo-machines and the test machines?
Attachment #592864 -
Flags: feedback?(rhelmer)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → jhford
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 592864 [details]
add 10.7 build machines to graphs db
Sorry for the delay, slipped through the cracks.
Attachment #592864 -
Flags: feedback?(rhelmer) → feedback+
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to John Ford [:jhford] from comment #2)
> Comment on attachment 592864 [details]
> add 10.7 build machines to graphs db
>
> Rob, any thoughts on sharing the os_id between the 'builder' pseudo-machines
> and the test machines?
From a quick look at the code I don't think it'll be a problem, but we can try on stage first if you want to make sure (shouldn't be hard to back out if not).
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robert Helmer [:rhelmer] from comment #4)
> (In reply to John Ford [:jhford] from comment #2)
> > Comment on attachment 592864 [details]
> > add 10.7 build machines to graphs db
> >
> > Rob, any thoughts on sharing the os_id between the 'builder' pseudo-machines
> > and the test machines?
>
> From a quick look at the code I don't think it'll be a problem, but we can
> try on stage first if you want to make sure (shouldn't be hard to back out
> if not).
I've been running this on stage for a while so there should be data to validate.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
If this looks OK, can you please run this on staging graphserver?
Attachment #592864 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #599246 -
Flags: review?(catlee)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 599246 [details] [diff] [review]
updated to use the 32-bit and 64-bit platforms
Chris is on vacation.
Aki, I am adding 32-bit and 64-bit machine names so that things are clear and explicit
Attachment #599246 -
Flags: review?(catlee) → review?(aki)
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #599246 -
Flags: review?(aki) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•12 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•