Closed
Bug 723861
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
xpidllex.py and xpidlyacc.py are missing in Gecko10.0 for both Win & Mac
Categories
(Firefox Build System :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla13
People
(Reporter: coolpaddy, Assigned: glandium)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [qa-][read Comment 17 if you're hitting this])
Attachments
(1 file)
904 bytes,
patch
|
ted
:
review+
lsblakk
:
approval-mozilla-aurora+
lsblakk
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User Agent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; U; en) Presto/2.8.131 Version/11.11 Steps to reproduce: I am trying to generate header and type lib using Gecko10.0(http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/10.0/sdk/xulrunner-10.0.en-US.win32.sdk.zip) for my XPCOM to support FF10. I am trying following commands: ...\xulrunner-sdk\sdk\bin>python header.py ISample.idl -I..\..\idl -o ISample.h ...\xulrunner-sdk\sdk\bin>python typelib.py ISample.idl -I..\..\idl -o ISample.xpt Actual results: I am getting following errors: ...\xulrunner-sdk\sdk\bin>python header.py ISample.idl -I..\..\idl -o ISample.h Traceback (most recent call last): File "header.py", line 497, in <module> p = xpidl.IDLParser(outputdir=options.cachedir) File "...\xulrunner-sdk\sdk\bin\xpidl.py", line 1453, in __init__ optimize=1) File "...\xulrunner-sdk\sdk\bin\ply\lex.py", line 1004, in lex lexobj.writetab(lextab,outputdir) File "...\xulrunner-sdk\sdk\bin\ply\lex.py", line 175, in writetab filename = os.path.join(outputdir,basetabfilename)+".py" File "C:\Python25\lib\ntpath.py", line 90, in join assert len(path) > 0 TypeError: object of type 'NoneType' has no len() ################################################################################# ...\xulrunner-sdk\sdk\bin>python typelib.py ISample.idl -I..\..\idl -o ISample.xpt Traceback (most recent call last): File "typelib.py", line 313, in <module> p = xpidl.IDLParser(outputdir=options.cachedir) File "...\xulrunner-sdk\sdk\bin\xpidl.py", line 1453, in __init__ optimize=1) File "...\xulrunner-sdk\sdk\bin\ply\lex.py", line 1004, in lex lexobj.writetab(lextab,outputdir) File "...\xulrunner-sdk\sdk\bin\ply\lex.py", line 175, in writetab filename = os.path.join(outputdir,basetabfilename)+".py" File "C:\Python25\lib\ntpath.py", line 90, in join assert len(path) > 0 TypeError: object of type 'NoneType' has no len() Expected results: On analysis I have found the xpidllex.py and xpidlyacc.py are missing in Gecko10.0. I have copied then from Gecko9.0 to Gecko10.0 and tried to generate the header and type and they worked fine. Then I built my XPCOM with these header and typelib and XPCOM now works fine with FF10. So following are my queries: Why xpidllex.py and xpidlyacc.py are missing in Gecko10.0? Is there any other way to generate header and typelib for Gecko10.0? Is use of xpidllex.py and xpidlyacc.py from Gecko9.0 in Gecko10.0 harmful? Please suggest.
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
As I understand it, bug 691781 removed the checked in copies, they're now generated as part of the build.
Using the xpidllex.py and xpidlyacc.py from Gecko 9 will work fine as a workaround.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Wasn't there another bug on this (or was that a mailing list post)?
Yeah, I think so, but I can't find it.
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Bug 722632, I don't know which way to dup this.
Please let me know resolution on this issue. xpidllex.py and xpidlyacc.py are missing in Gecko11.0 too.
Assignee: nobody → khuey
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #598235 -
Flags: review?(ted.mielczarek)
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #598235 -
Flags: review?(ted.mielczarek) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/013b99c7ae65
Assignee: khuey → mh+mozilla
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
status1.9.2:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox-esr10:
--- → affected
status-firefox10:
--- → affected
status-firefox11:
--- → affected
status-firefox12:
--- → affected
status-firefox13:
--- → fixed
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla13
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 598235 [details] [diff] [review] Ship xpidllex.py and xpidlyacc.py [Approval Request Comment] This prevents the SDK from being completely useful (though this can be worked around by giving a --cachedir to the header.py and typelib.py scripts). This only ships two additional files in the SDK and changes nothing else. Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): none String changes made by this patch: none I'd request approval for esr, but the flag doesn't show up.
Attachment #598235 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #598235 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
Since this landed, my local -inbound tree fails to build on OS X (10.6), with the error: make[7]: Entering directory `/Users/jonathan/mozdev/mozilla-inbound/obj-ff/xpcom/typelib/xpidl' /Users/jonathan/mozdev/mozilla-inbound/obj-ff/config/nsinstall -D ../../../dist/sdk/bin/ply /Users/jonathan/mozdev/mozilla-inbound/obj-ff/config/nsinstall -L /Users/jonathan/mozdev/mozilla-inbound/obj-ff/xpcom/typelib/xpidl -m 755 /Users/jonathan/mozdev/mozilla-inbound/other-licenses/ply/ply/__init__.py /Users/jonathan/mozdev/mozilla-inbound/other-licenses/ply/ply/lex.py /Users/jonathan/mozdev/mozilla-inbound/other-licenses/ply/ply/yacc.py ../../../dist/sdk/bin/ply make[8]: Entering directory `/Users/jonathan/mozdev/mozilla-inbound/obj-ff/xpcom/typelib/xpidl' make[8]: *** No rule to make target `../../../xpcom/idl-parser/xpidllex.py', needed by `libs'. Stop. Obviously, this isn't affecting tinderbox, as tbpl shows happy builds ... I don't know why it's failing locally for me.
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
I have the same build failure on Mac OS X 10.7.
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
So, after investigation, Josh and Jonathan's problem was leftovers from times when xpidllex.py and xpidlyacc.py were created in the srcdir instead of the objdir.
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mike Hommey [:glandium] from comment #14) > So, after investigation, Josh and Jonathan's problem was leftovers from > times when xpidllex.py and xpidlyacc.py were created in the srcdir instead > of the objdir. Sure? I get the error of Comment #12 even after hg co -C && hg purge. In order to compile m-c I had to backout 013b99c7ae65.
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Stefan from comment #15) > (In reply to Mike Hommey [:glandium] from comment #14) > > So, after investigation, Josh and Jonathan's problem was leftovers from > > times when xpidllex.py and xpidlyacc.py were created in the srcdir instead > > of the objdir. > > Sure? I get the error of Comment #12 even after hg co -C && hg purge. In > order to compile m-c I had to backout 013b99c7ae65. rm $objdir/xpcom/idl-parser/*.pyc ; they are hgignored, and hg purge doesn't remove them.
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mike Hommey [:glandium] from comment #16) > rm $objdir/xpcom/idl-parser/*.pyc ; they are hgignored, and hg purge doesn't > remove them. erm, that's rm $srcdir/xpcom/idl-parser/*.pyc
Comment 18•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/013b99c7ae65
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #598235 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #598235 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta+
Attachment #598235 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Attachment #598235 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora+
Updated•12 years ago
|
tracking-firefox-esr10:
--- → 11+
Comment 19•12 years ago
|
||
Please see https://wiki.mozilla.org/Release_Management/ESR_Landing_Process for information on landing on mozilla-esr10 before 3/2.
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•12 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/1f89179f19d7 http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/rev/76add95f5ce4 Also landed on the COMM110_2012022204_RELBRANCH by mistake :( http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/rev/5738e8b0a963
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Comment 21•12 years ago
|
||
[Triage comment] Hi Mike, this bug is being tracked for landing on ESR branch. Please land patches on http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr10/ before Thursday March 1, 2012 in order to be ready for go-to-build on Friday March 2, 2012.
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•12 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr10/rev/52637db4f742
(In reply to Mike Hommey [:glandium] from comment #14) > So, after investigation, Josh and Jonathan's problem was leftovers from > times when xpidllex.py and xpidlyacc.py were created in the srcdir instead > of the objdir. Could we add an rm command somewhere during configure or make so that this automatically gets fixed?
Comment 24•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) (away February 21 to March 17) from comment #23) > (In reply to Mike Hommey [:glandium] from comment #14) > > So, after investigation, Josh and Jonathan's problem was leftovers from > > times when xpidllex.py and xpidlyacc.py were created in the srcdir instead > > of the objdir. > > Could we add an rm command somewhere during configure or make so that this > automatically gets fixed? In principle, I don't think configure or make should be modifying the source tree in any way.
Sure, but in this case they'd just be undoing a modification that shouldn't have happened in the first place.
Comment 26•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jonathan Kew (:jfkthame) from comment #24) > In principle, I don't think configure or make should be modifying the source > tree in any way. Sure, if you build outside of the source tree. But building outside the source tree (on which I removed the write permission) fails: /bin/sh: ../m-c/.mozconfig.out: Permission denied client.mk: 136 run_for_side_effects := \ 137 $(shell $(TOPSRCDIR)/$(MOZCONFIG_LOADER) $(TOPSRCDIR) $(TOPSRCDIR)/.mo zconfig.mk > $(TOPSRCDIR)/.mozconfig.out) ^
Comment 27•12 years ago
|
||
Can someone possibly re-open this bug by changing the bug status? I got bitten by the same bug (I think), but since its status was fixed, it didn't show up on the first simple search. I my case, I had to install system's python-ply (lex/yacc tool) first, and run make clean and then recompile everything. I am not sure why, but both the new python tools and make clean was necessary on my Debian [wheezy] system.) Looks to me that these are all related: 691836 nor -- Linu nobody NEW --- Build system doesn't correctly reparse IDL files when the xpidl parser has changed 729752 nor -- All nobody NEW --- Old .pyc files in srcdir shouldn't break the build and this one.
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•12 years ago
|
||
For what it's worth, "make clean" removes the problematic .pyc files from the source directory because of http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/js/xpconnect/src/Makefile.in#250
Comment 29•12 years ago
|
||
comment 28: I ran into this bug, didn't think of make clean since I blew away my obj dir but it was still breaking. We should auto-clean these files when building.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [qa-] → [qa-][read Comment 17 if you're hitting this]
Updated•11 years ago
|
status1.9.2:
unaffected → ---
status-firefox-esr10:
fixed → ---
status-firefox10:
affected → ---
status-firefox11:
fixed → ---
status-firefox12:
fixed → ---
status-firefox13:
fixed → ---
tracking-firefox-esr10:
11+ → ---
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Core → Firefox Build System
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•