Closed
Bug 739027
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
crash in nsXPConnect::Push
Categories
(Core :: XPConnect, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 741056
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox14 | - | --- |
People
(Reporter: scoobidiver, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: crash, regression, topcrash)
Crash Data
It first appeared in 14.0a1/20120324 and is currently #7 top crasher in 14.0a1 over the last day. The regression range is: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=ab2ff3b5611f&tochange=df1f94b2bdee Signature MOZ_Crash More Reports Search UUID 86633383-842b-41ff-bf50-71d2b2120325 Date Processed 2012-03-25 06:40:08 Uptime 27 Last Crash 5.1 minutes before submission Install Age 52.7 minutes since version was first installed. Install Time 2012-03-25 06:50:04 Product Firefox Version 14.0a1 Build ID 20120324031100 Release Channel nightly OS Windows NT OS Version 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 Build Architecture x86 Build Architecture Info GenuineIntel family 6 model 23 stepping 10 Crash Reason EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_WRITE Crash Address 0x0 App Notes AdapterVendorID: 0x8086, AdapterDeviceID: 0x29c2, AdapterSubsysID: 00000000, AdapterDriverVersion: 6.14.10.5029 D3D10 Layers? D3D10 Layers- D3D9 Layers? D3D9 Layers- EMCheckCompatibility True Total Virtual Memory 2147352576 Available Virtual Memory 1970843648 System Memory Use Percentage 24 Available Page File 3776618496 Available Physical Memory 1613959168 Frame Module Signature [Expand] Source 0 mozglue.dll MOZ_Crash mfbt/Assertions.cpp:70 1 mozglue.dll MOZ_Assert mfbt/Assertions.cpp:88 2 xul.dll nsXPConnect::Push js/xpconnect/src/nsXPConnect.cpp:2558 3 xul.dll nsThread::ProcessNextEvent xpcom/threads/nsThread.cpp:622 4 xul.dll mozilla::ipc::MessagePump::Run ipc/glue/MessagePump.cpp:134 5 xul.dll MessageLoop::RunHandler ipc/chromium/src/base/message_loop.cc:201 6 xul.dll MessageLoop::Run ipc/chromium/src/base/message_loop.cc:175 7 xul.dll nsBaseAppShell::Run widget/xpwidgets/nsBaseAppShell.cpp:189 8 xul.dll nsAppShell::Run widget/windows/nsAppShell.cpp:267 9 xul.dll nsAppStartup::Run toolkit/components/startup/nsAppStartup.cpp:295 10 xul.dll XRE_main toolkit/xre/nsAppRunner.cpp:3703 11 msvcr100.dll msvcr100.dll@0x8b581 12 firefox.exe wmain toolkit/xre/nsWindowsWMain.cpp:107 13 msvcr100.dll _initterm f:\\dd\\vctools\\crt_bld\\self_x86\\crt\\src\\crt0dat.c:872 14 firefox.exe __tmainCRTStartup crtexe.c:552 15 firefox.exe _SEH_epilog4 16 kernel32.dll BaseProcessStart 17 kernel32.dll GetCodePageFileInfo 18 kernel32.dll BaseProcessStart 19 firefox.exe pre_c_init crtexe.c:261 More reports at: https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/list?signature=MOZ_Crash
Looks like a threading problem. Have you seen this, Bobby? I'm pretty sure it's this assertion: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/js/xpconnect/src/xpcprivate.h#3698
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
This stack doesn't seem to make sense - it certainly appears that it's on the main thread, and the crashing code is asserting just that...
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Here are some addon and module manual correlations I dug up: MOZ_Crash|EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_WRITE (60 crashes) 15% (9/60) vs. 4% (47/1085) {8620c15f-30dc-4dba-a131-7c5d20cf4a29} (Nightly Tester Tools, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/6543) 10% (6/60) vs. 1% (7/1085) {578e7caa-210f-4967-a0d3-88fe5b59a39f} (Textarea Cache, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/5761) 8% (5/60) vs. 0% (5/1085) nl-NL@dictionaries.addons.mozilla.org (Woordenboek Nederlands, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/3291) 8% (5/60) vs. 0% (5/1085) {848DC626-5EC9-4D09-A19F-E7F708EE2475} 8% (5/60) vs. 0% (5/1085) jid1-bpzDizt9E1R7nw@jetpack 8% (5/60) vs. 0% (5/1085) {336f36f7-72b2-4314-984a-ae7cac4b7328} (Extended Cookie Manager, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/1243) 8% (5/60) vs. 1% (6/1085) SQLiteManager@mrinalkant.blogspot.com (SQLite Manager, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/5817) 8% (5/60) vs. 1% (7/1085) color_management@seanhayes.name (Color Management, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/6891) 8% (5/60) vs. 1% (7/1085) {f36c6cd1-da73-491d-b290-8fc9115bfa55} (WorldIP, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/8661) 8% (5/60) vs. 1% (10/1085) {E6C1199F-E687-42da-8C24-E7770CC3AE66} (QuickJava, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/1237) 8% (5/60) vs. 1% (16/1085) {bb6bc1bb-f824-4702-90cd-35e2fb24f25d} 8% (5/60) vs. 1% (16/1085) requestpolicy@requestpolicy.com (RequestPolicy, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/9727) 10% (6/60) vs. 3% (35/1085) {1BC9BA34-1EED-42ca-A505-6D2F1A935BBB} 8% (5/60) vs. 2% (18/1085) jid1-F9UJ2thwoAm5gQ@jetpack 8% (5/60) vs. 2% (19/1085) de-DE@dictionaries.addons.mozilla.org (German Dictionary, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/3077) 10% (6/60) vs. 5% (50/1085) firebug@software.joehewitt.com (Firebug, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/1843) MOZ_Crash|EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_WRITE (60 crashes) 35% (21/60) vs. 8% (92/1085) msv1_0.dll 65% (39/60) vs. 41% (444/1085) t2embed.dll 45% (27/60) vs. 22% (234/1085) lz32.dll 45% (27/60) vs. 22% (235/1085) wldap32.dll 45% (27/60) vs. 22% (240/1085) xpsp2res.dll 38% (23/60) vs. 16% (178/1085) MSCTFIME.IME 82% (49/60) vs. 60% (650/1085) mozjs.dll 48% (29/60) vs. 27% (296/1085) netapi32.dll 45% (27/60) vs. 25% (274/1085) comres.dll 55% (33/60) vs. 35% (383/1085) mpr.dll 45% (27/60) vs. 25% (275/1085) hnetcfg.dll 45% (27/60) vs. 25% (275/1085) wshtcpip.dll 98% (59/60) vs. 80% (870/1085) nssckbi.dll 22% (13/60) vs. 4% (40/1085) faultrep.dll 45% (27/60) vs. 27% (294/1085) ws2help.dll 50% (30/60) vs. 32% (349/1085) imagehlp.dll 45% (27/60) vs. 27% (295/1085) iphlpapi.dll 98% (59/60) vs. 81% (875/1085) freebl3.dll 98% (59/60) vs. 81% (875/1085) nssdbm3.dll 100% (60/60) vs. 83% (900/1085) winrnr.dll 50% (30/60) vs. 33% (360/1085) winspool.drv 100% (60/60) vs. 84% (911/1085) feclient.dll 95% (57/60) vs. 80% (863/1085) psapi.dll 100% (60/60) vs. 85% (923/1085) gkmedias.dll 100% (60/60) vs. 86% (933/1085) browsercomps.dll 100% (60/60) vs. 86% (937/1085) softokn3.dll 100% (60/60) vs. 86% (938/1085) firefox.exe 100% (60/60) vs. 87% (939/1085) xpcom.dll 17% (10/60) vs. 3% (35/1085) captlib.dll 100% (60/60) vs. 87% (940/1085) dbghelp.dll 17% (10/60) vs. 3% (36/1085) mslbui.dll 97% (58/60) vs. 84% (911/1085) lpk.dll 27% (16/60) vs. 14% (155/1085) wtsapi32.dll 25% (15/60) vs. 14% (154/1085) MSCTF.dll 100% (60/60) vs. 89% (969/1085) dnsapi.dll 12% (7/60) vs. 2% (22/1085) kloehk.dll 27% (16/60) vs. 17% (185/1085) cryptui.dll 27% (16/60) vs. 18% (192/1085) winsta.dll 100% (60/60) vs. 91% (989/1085) wintrust.dll 13% (8/60) vs. 5% (54/1085) atiuxpag.dll 13% (8/60) vs. 5% (55/1085) atidxx32.dll 13% (8/60) vs. 5% (58/1085) aticfx32.dll 100% (60/60) vs. 93% (1007/1085) mswsock.dll 8% (5/60) vs. 1% (14/1085) PrxerNsp.dll 8% (5/60) vs. 1% (14/1085) PrxerDrv.dll 55% (33/60) vs. 49% (529/1085) secur32.dll 17% (10/60) vs. 11% (117/1085) msvcp60.dll
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
It's currently #1 top crasher in 14.0a1 over the last 3 days.
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Bobby Holley (:bholley) from comment #2) > This stack doesn't seem to make sense - it certainly appears that it's on > the main thread, and the crashing code is asserting just that... Well, this still remains the #1 issue on trunk, so we better get some idea about it - at least how we can investigate further.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
correct me if I'm wrong (scoobidiver?), but crash-stats shows tihs disappearing from the nightlies starting with Apr 06.. https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/list?product=Firefox&version=Firefox%3A14.0a1&query_search=signature&query_type=contains&reason_type=contains&date=04%2F11%2F2012%2019%3A48%3A59&range_value=2&range_unit=weeks&hang_type=any&process_type=any&do_query=1&signature=nsXPConnect%3A%3APush%28JSContext*%29 That means almost certainly that its a dup of 741056 - which caused other weird corruptions too such as 740319 (and 741056 was a fix of an issue introduced in the regression range for this bug.)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Updated•12 years ago
|
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•