Content preview heading on e-mails needs to be removed.

RESOLVED INVALID

Status

Thunderbird
General
RESOLVED INVALID
6 years ago
6 years ago

People

(Reporter: dgreen, Unassigned)

Tracking

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

Attachments

(2 attachments)

(Reporter)

Description

6 years ago
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0
Build ID: 20120420145725

Steps to reproduce:

Recieved following e-mail

Content preview:  Hi Peter, Just so so there is no confusion. I have responded
    to an rfi stating that we are going to provide h12 bars 1500 long to complete
    the splice of the bar marks 1&2. Just didn't want a drawing specifying something
    else. That is what we discussed yesterday. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (-1.9 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD      Envelope sender domain matches handover relay

                             domain
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Flag: NO

Hi Peter, 
Just so so there is no confusion. I have responded to an rfi stating that we are going to provide h12 bars 1500 long to complete the splice of the bar marks 1&2. Just didn't want a drawing specifying something else. That is what we discussed yesterday.

Regards 



Actual results:

Well the part 

Content preview:  Hi Peter, Just so so there is no confusion. I have responded
    to an rfi stating that we are going to provide h12 bars 1500 long to complete
    the splice of the bar marks 1&2. Just didn't want a drawing specifying something
    else. That is what we discussed yesterday. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (-1.9 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD      Envelope sender domain matches handover relay

                             domain
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Flag: NO

Should most definately not be visable in an e-mail, it is happening with great regularity


Expected results:

Just recieved the main body of the text

Hi Peter, 
Just so so there is no confusion. I have responded to an rfi stating that we are going to provide h12 bars 1500 long to complete the splice of the bar marks 1&2. Just didn't want a drawing specifying something else. That is what we discussed yesterday.

Regards

Comment 1

6 years ago
How would we know to strip out the text you don't want to see? If the content analysis part is just regular text in the message body, it's not something we know about.
Ain't security sensitive.

Can you attach the email in question so we can have a look at the headers ?
Group: core-security
(Reporter)

Comment 3

6 years ago
I only have the copy of the e-mail that was sent to me, how would I go about attaching this for you guys to view?

Comment 4

6 years ago
Export it from Thunderbird in EML format and use the "add an attachment" link on the top of this page.

Comment 5

6 years ago
This same issue just started for me about mid-May.  TB 13.0 on Windows XP.  The behavior is consistent with messages from certain sources, but some sources are no problem. Roughly 50%  Seems like messages with HTML may be the ones with problems. No change if I view in "Original HTML" or "Simple HTML."  Example email and screenshot of how it draws attached.

Comment 6

6 years ago
Created attachment 630382 [details]
Screenshot showing how content preview data shows up

Comment 7

6 years ago
Created attachment 630385 [details]
Exported email that was the source for the screenshot above
Whoever produces these double content preview parts, it is not TB and as long as all of these parts end up in a single part of multipart msg, there is nothing TB can do about it to hide them.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.