Closed Bug 760447 Opened 8 years ago Closed 7 years ago

Update .ua entry in PSL


(Core :: Networking: Domain Lists, defect)

Not set





(Reporter: gerv, Unassigned)



(2 files, 1 obsolete file)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: amendments to .ua suffix list
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:03:10 +0300
From: Dmitry Kohmanyuk <>
CC: domain-master <>


Here is updated list of .UA public domains (suffixes).  Please update table at


Some of those are reserved but not yet delegated (included into DNS).
Nevertheless they are included into the list as their policy is known in advance.

# cat | perl -alne 'print $F[0] if /^\w.*\s(TXT|NS)\s/' | sed 's/$/.ua/' | fmt | wc 
      11      76     723

URLs: (old master list, not always up-to-date) (links to policy details) (unofficial)

Changes for list of non-generic 2lds:

--- /tmp/ua-ps  2012-04-27 12:57:56.000000000 +0000
+++ /tmp/ua-pub 2012-04-27 12:57:39.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,46 +1,70 @@

A user of my Ruby PSL library reported today an issue with the .UA TLD and I came across this ticket while working on a patch for the PSL.

Here's the issue.

I created a similar patch extracting the .UA domains from the page
However, it seems that the page at doesn't include all the new .UA zones that are going to be deployed in the future.

Unfortunately, the issue reported by the Ruby user is still not fixed. It seems that, in some cases, 2LD are accessible as a standalone URL. Here's the case of

- (requires authentication)
- (redirects)

How should we handle this? One exception entry for each geographic name?
Attached patch Patch for .UA (obsolete) — Splinter Review
BTW, here's my patch. It's similar to Gervase's patch, but I updates the references in the comments and it doesn't include the still-to-be-deployed .UA zones.

I think that we can reasonably merge the comment changes from mine and the entry changes from Gervase's one to get the final patch.

@Gervase I can proceed and create the final patch if it's ok for you, unless you want to only keep the current zones, at that point this patch should be fine.
Attachment #640215 - Flags: review?(gerv)
Comment on attachment 640215 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch for .UA

Hi Simone,

Sorry for the delay. "My patch" comes from the UA TLD, so we should probably use what they have sent us!

Attachment #640215 - Flags: review?(gerv) → review-
Attachment #640215 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #660416 - Flags: review?(gerv)
Hi Gervase,

I reviewed the patch taking your as a starting point and updating the comments about date of submission and URLs.
It is ready for review now.

-- Simone
Attachment #660416 - Flags: review?(gerv) → review+
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla18
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.