Closed Bug 76147 Opened 24 years ago Closed 24 years ago

new cvs account for Wade Majors

Categories

(mozilla.org :: Repository Account Requests, task)

Other
Other
task
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: wade, Assigned: marcia)

Details

This is a request for CVS write access. I would be handling BeOS related bugs and checkins.
Wade: Please go to http://mozilla.org/hacking/getting-cvs-write-access.html and fill out the CVS access form. That link also provides info about what else you need to do if you will be checking code into the tree.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Summary: new cvs account → new cvs account for Wade Majors
I have faxed the CVS contributor form to Marcia Knous. I will mail the hard copy upon confirmation if needed. I believe Christopher Seawood (cls@seawood.org) will be vouching for me. Daniel Nunes (leaf@mozilla.org) has agreed to this under the assurance that I will only be checkin modifications to beos specific folders.
Yes, I'm vouching with the same understanding as leaf, changes to BeOS specific dirs only. Changes to BeOS ifdefs under other modules would still have to go through the normal patch/review process for now. Since BeOS isn't a tier-1 platform for mozilla.org, I'm assuming that the usual super-reviewer & tree closure exceptions apply for ports. Someone correct me if I'm wrong: 1) You do not need a super review for ports changes although they must be reviewed by someone else familiar with the code. 2) Each checkin comment should have the bug number and r=<name and/or email address of reviewer> 3) If you're checking in changes for someone else, please give proper attribution in your checkin comment. 4) We do have a BeOS tinderbox so, of course, it must stay green after your checkins. 5) You can check in during a closed tree to fix tinderbox bustage and you should note this in your checkin comment. 6) You can check in platform porting fixes to the tree during the daily closure under either the "NOT PART OF THE BUILD" or "<platform> ONLY" loophole. (Not sure if that should be encouraged but that's the current standard.) 7) Milestone tree closures still require approval from the build verification team/sheriff before checking in. Also make sure that you read the 'Rules & Tips' section of the reviewers' doc, http://www.mozilla.org/hacking/reviewers.html .
I can agree with those guidelines. Most of which were on the form I signed.
Just checking in. I know you guys are busy with 0.9 work, don't want to be an annoyance. Is there something else I need to do? What's the next step?
marcia, wade is outside the regular criteria, on the basis that he's going to be touching BeOS specific folders. cls vouching was the only thing he needed.
Per Leaf's comment, account activated. resolving as fixed.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.