Open
Bug 764524
Opened 12 years ago
Updated 2 months ago
Comment out bug 693938's noisy NS_WARNING about transparent content
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P4)
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: cpeterson, Unassigned)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
1.32 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Bug 693938 added an NS_WARNING about transparent content with displayports. Unfortunately, this warning can get VERY noisy when Fennec is taking screenshots of web pages. blassey says, "that warning should probably be removed. it's not useful." I/Gecko ( 8965): WARNING: We don't support transparent content with displayports, force it to be opqaue: file /Users/cpeterson/Code/mozilla/central/layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp, line 639 I/Gecko ( 8965): WARNING: We don't support transparent content with displayports, force it to be opqaue: file /Users/cpeterson/Code/mozilla/central/layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp, line 639 I/Gecko ( 8965): WARNING: We don't support transparent content with displayports, force it to be opqaue: file /Users/cpeterson/Code/mozilla/central/layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp, line 639 I/Gecko ( 8965): WARNING: We don't support transparent content with displayports, force it to be opqaue: file /Users/cpeterson/Code/mozilla/central/layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp, line 639
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Comment out bug 693938's noisy NS_WARNING about transparent content. blassey says, "that warning should probably be removed. it's not useful."
Assignee: nobody → cpeterson
Attachment #632814 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
I actually think this warning could be important. Why are we hitting it?
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
blassey, in bug 693938, romaxa marked XUL Fennec's checkerboard layer as RGB24 and CONTENT_OPAQUE. Native Fennec's CheckerboardImage.java is a RGB565 CairoImage, but we don't seem to specify that the checkerboard is opaque. Is that set elsewhere or not applicable to Native Fennec?
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Cwiiis, does this layout warning about our root layer not being opaque look like something we should fix? I see this warning all the time when Fennec is saving screenshots: I/Gecko ( 8965): WARNING: We don't support transparent content with displayports, force it to be opqaue: file /Users/cpeterson/Code/mozilla/central/layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp, line 639
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Chris Peterson (:cpeterson) from comment #4) > Cwiiis, does this layout warning about our root layer not being opaque look > like something we should fix? I see this warning all the time when Fennec is > saving screenshots: > > I/Gecko ( 8965): WARNING: We don't support transparent content with > displayports, force it to be opqaue: file > /Users/cpeterson/Code/mozilla/central/layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp, line 639 I recall we fixed something along these lines, perhaps bug 733607? Is this just an issue with taking of screenshots? It wouldn't hurt to fix it, certainly - Cc'ing kats in case his memory is fresher than mine.
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
I don't recall anything about this, sorry :( I don't think I was involved in bug 733607 either.
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Chris Lord [:cwiiis] from comment #5) > I recall we fixed something along these lines, perhaps bug 733607? Is this > just an issue with taking of screenshots? It wouldn't hurt to fix it, I don't know if this issue only affects screenshots, but it is triggered every time we take a screenshot.
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
(Just as an aside, if you do land this patch, please fix the typo: s/opqaue/opaque/. It's driving me nuts now!)
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
kats, my patch already includes the spelling fix. :)
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P4
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 632814 [details] [diff] [review] comment-out-warning.patch Withdrawing r=? until roc's question can be properly answered.
Attachment #632814 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: cpeterson → nobody
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Component: Layout: Misc Code → Layout
Product: Core Graveyard → Core
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
Comment hidden (spam) |
Updated•2 months ago
|
Attachment #9384343 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•