765225 - Finish converting DekiScript templates to KumaScript

Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME

(Developer Documentation Graveyard :: General, defect, P2)

Description

[Luke Crouch [:groovecoder]]

This is a tracking bug to maintain a list of DekiScript templates that we need to convert to KumaScript. Either file/move dependency bugs for certain templates found, or else add them as a comment here.

Comment 1

[Les Orchard [:lorchard]]

FWIW, there are about 550 or so templates left needing attention [1]... I don't think we want to file that many blockers here :)

[1] https://developer-new.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/needs-review/template

Comment 2

[Luke Crouch [:groovecoder]]

Using this as a place to put the bugs that test day participants file against broken templates content issues.

Comment 3

[Luke Crouch [:groovecoder]]

Tracking bug - not really a sprint bug.

Comment 4

[John Karahalis [:openjck]]

Out of our hands, but keeping it here so that we can track it.

Comment 5

[John Karahalis [:openjck]]

Please also take a look at these documents, which do not have the "needs review" flag but are also *not* converted.

https://etherpad.mozilla.org/bug774985

Comment 6

[Jeremie Patonnier :Jeremie]

We seriously need a way to know which page use which template if we want to clean the mess.

Comment 7

[Luke Crouch [:groovecoder]]

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=714804 has page & template usage stats from a while back. I imagine it's still accurate for finding the ones that are still broken.

Comment 8

[John Karahalis [:openjck]]

Also the templates listed here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774985#c9

Comment 9

[John Karahalis [:openjck]]

Sheppy, Jean-Yves: I am getting a few bug reports related to template errors. Would you be able to work down these lists over time?

Comment 10

[Eric Shepherd [:sheppy]]

We keep poking at them. I'd recommend filing a bug for each one and ccing us. There's a list but it's to the point where it's hard to know which ones matter.

That said, nearly all of them rely on features we don't have in KumaScript yet.

Comment 11

[John Karahalis [:openjck]]

This was getting a little out of hand, so I cleaned things up.

I have grouped templates by the KumaScript features that they need and have opened a separate bug for each. I have marked each bug as /depending/ on those features, so that we will know we are ready to convert the templates once they become available.

I have also opened a bug about general template cleanup. Many thanks to Trevor for sorting all of this out with the Etherpad mentioned comment 5.

Templates that need to be converted:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=765225&hide_resolved=1

General template cleanup (only showing one level of depth):
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=784820&maxdepth=1&hide_resolved=1

Comment 12

[John Karahalis [:openjck]]

Also, to get an idea of which templates matter most, please see this spreadsheet which sorts them by usage:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvhZer0zAbZHdDRpbm04SEJ5NXpHWHNialdENHJqUFE#gid=0