Closed
Bug 768737
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Text field (to enter email address) looks like it can't be edited (but it can) (15.0a2)
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Form Controls, defect)
Core
Layout: Form Controls
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 769405
People
(Reporter: simon, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: regression)
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120626 Firefox/15.0a2 Build ID: 20120626042007 Steps to reproduce: visited this link: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/aurora/ and tried to sign up for newsletter using Aurora 15.0a2 (2012-06-26). Actual results: Cursor did not appear in box. Also couldn't select "Your email address" to highlight for copying to clipboard. If I started typing the "Your email address" disappeared and what I typed did appear (but no cursor). Was still able to submit my email address and sign up for newsletter but it was confusing as at first I thought I couldn't. This issue occurs in Aurora and Nightly(16) but not Stable(13) or Beta(14). Expected results: "Your email address" should have disappeared as soon as cursor placed in box. Should have been seen a cursor to indicate field was editable.
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Confirmed this happens in latest-mozilla-central on Linux as well.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Untriaged → DOM: Core & HTML
Ever confirmed: true
Keywords: regressionwindow-wanted
OS: Windows XP → All
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: untriaged → general
Hardware: x86 → All
Version: 15 Branch → Trunk
Simon, can you please investigate using progressively earlier versions of Aurora to find a regression window for this bug? We need to narrow down the exact day where this started to happen. Thanks.
Component: DOM: Core & HTML → Layout: Form Controls
QA Contact: general → layout.form-controls
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Anthony Hughes, Mozilla QA (irc: ashughes) from comment #2) > Simon, can you please investigate using progressively earlier versions of > Aurora to find a regression window for this bug? We need to narrow down the > exact day where this started to happen. Thanks. I confirmed this happens in 15.0a1 but I am not sure where to get an earlier build of 15. Can you point me to URL to download earlier builds of 15? I have already confirmed this is not present in the latest 14 (Beta). Regards, Simon.
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2012/ (by year/month) (Note that every six weeks code moves from mozilla-central to mozilla-aurora, mozilla-aurora to mozilla-beta, and mozilla-beta to mozilla-release, pretty much simultaneously. So to track down builds of 15, you'd look at mozilla-aurora builds from now back to June 5 or so, and mozilla-central before that. The version number is in the filenames.)
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
I have found the regression: Portable zip downloaded from ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/2012/05/2012-05-25-03-05-17-mozilla-central/firefox-15.0a1.en-US.win32.zip doesn't have regression whereas ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/2012/05/2012-05-25-07-02-45-mozilla-central/firefox-15.0a1.en-US.win32.zip does have regression. Can someone double check this? Regards, Simon Grant.
Last Good: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/15.0 Firefox/15.0a1 ID:20120525030517 http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/1dd0c5c6d9fd First Bad: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/15.0 Firefox/15.0a1 ID:20120525070245 http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/3871d6ca5fb2 Pushlog: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=1dd0c5c6d9fd&tochange=3871d6ca5fb2 Potential Bugs: Bug 673873 - Display placeholder when focusing empty input
Keywords: regressionwindow-wanted → regression
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Sounds like the behavior is exactly what it should be, given the markup on the site and the desired behavior in bug 673873. The only issue I see here is the lack of a caret in the textfield, right? Mounir?
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Boris Zbarsky (:bz) from comment #8) > Sounds like the behavior is exactly what it should be, given the markup on > the site and the desired behavior in bug 673873. The only issue I see here > is the lack of a caret in the textfield, right? Mounir? Actually, there is a caret. It's just black so we can't see it.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•