Closed Bug 770471 Opened 12 years ago Closed 12 years ago

[config] att.net is changing hostnames

Categories

(Webtools :: ISPDB Database Entries, defect)

x86
Windows XP
defect
Not set
minor

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: el.cameleon.1, Assigned: el.cameleon.1)

References

()

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

att.net is upgrading its settings.

From http://www.att.com/esupport/article.jsp?sid=KB401570&ct=9000086&pv=1&title=Email+server+settings+%28POP+and+SMTP%29#fbid=u-AGOk0axcj
"AT&T's POP/SMTP settings have changed to inbound.att.net and outbound.att.net, but if you are using the old server settings (pop.att.yahoo.com and smtp.att.yahoo.com), they will continue to work. You do not have to change them at this time."

The current autoconfiguration file still use xxx.att.yahoo.com
Vincent could you create the new file and then we'd ask reviews to :benb and :gozer ?
Assignee: nobody → el.cameleon.1
Attached patch new att.net configuration file (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Here is the patch.
I have just reorder the list of subdomain in order to be coherent with att support.
I also updated pop and smtp server name.
Note that I don't have any att.net account, so I haven't test it.
Attachment #638674 - Flags: review?(ben.bucksch)
Attachment #638674 - Flags: feedback?(gozer)
This is not an upgrade, no improvement. Merely the hostname changed.
Summary: [config] att.net is upgrading its settings → [config] att.net is changing hostnames
Comment on attachment 638674 [details] [diff] [review]
new att.net configuration file

This is not a proper patch/diff, and you also change other values.
Attachment #638674 - Flags: review?(ben.bucksch)
Attachment #638674 - Flags: review-
Attachment #638674 - Flags: feedback?(gozer)
> old server settings (pop.att.yahoo.com and smtp.att.yahoo.com), they will continue to work

-> minor
Severity: normal → minor
(In reply to Ben Bucksch (:BenB) from comment #5)
> This is not a proper patch/diff, 
I don't know how to make a proper patch/diff, sorry.

> and you also change other values.
This is exactly what I have explained in comment 2. Note that the value hasn't change, they just have been reordered in order to be compliant with the att support page.
Ben, is there something that need to be done in order to close this bug? Do you expect me to do these things?
I've also reordered the list of subdomain in order to be consistent with att support.
Attachment #638674 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #658846 - Flags: review?(sancus)
Comment on attachment 658846 [details] [diff] [review]
The new AT&T data.

This seems fine, I don't care about the order of domains.
Attachment #658846 - Flags: review?(sancus) → review+
committed in r108902.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
> I've also reordered the list of subdomain in order to be consistent with att support.

FWIW, I had ordered them by importance / size of the domain, so that we can see quickly that this also handles sbcglobal et al without scanning the whole list.
Component: ispdb → ISPDB Database Entries
Product: Mozilla Messaging → Webtools
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: