Closed
Bug 772753
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Outline style problem (absolute positioned childs should not expand parent's outline)
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Core
Layout
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 687311
People
(Reporter: teploukhovk, Unassigned)
Details
(Keywords: testcase)
Attachments
(3 files)
Untitled.png
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/536.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/20.0.1132.47 Safari/536.11 Steps to reproduce: Page code: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge" /> <title></title> <style type="text/css"> .cls1 { position: relative; height: 50px; width: 50px; background-color: red; outline: 1px solid #000000; } .cls2 { position: absolute; left: -10px; top: -10px; height: 20px; width: 20px; background-color: yellow; } .cls3 { position: absolute; right: -10px; bottom: -20px; height: 20px; width: 20px; background-color: green; } </style> </head> <body> <div class="cls1"> some text <div class="cls2"></div> <div class="cls3"></div> </div> </body> </html> Actual results: Outline border covers all absolute elements. Expected results: Outline border must covers only div with className cls1. Screens of expected and current result in attachment.
Duplicate?
Component: Untriaged → Layout
Keywords: testcase
OS: Windows 7 → All
Product: Firefox → Core
Hardware: x86_64 → All
Summary: Outline style problem → Outline style problem (absolute positioned childs should not expand parent's outline)
Version: 13 Branch → Trunk
Descendant elements definitely should expand the parent's outline. The question here is whether absolutely positioned descendants should be an exception to that rule.
|
Reporter | |
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Baron [:dbaron] from comment #4) > Descendant elements definitely should expand the parent's outline. The > question here is whether absolutely positioned descendants should be an > exception to that rule. I agree.
I think this bug depends on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480888
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•