Closed Bug 773289 Opened 12 years ago Closed 12 years ago

Gateway timeout (504) on user/6265594

Categories

(addons.mozilla.org Graveyard :: Add-on Builder, defect)

defect
Not set
critical

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WORKSFORME

People

(Reporter: stephend, Unassigned)

References

()

Details

(Whiteboard: [fromAutomation])

Attachments

(1 file)

Our productions suite caught this (Selenium):

https://builder.addons.mozilla.org/user/6265594/ gives us a gateway timeout:

[11:02:33.993] GET https://builder.addons.mozilla.org/user/6265594/ [HTTP/1.1 504 Gateway Time-out 31834ms]
Assignee: server-ops-webops → server-ops
Component: Server Operations: Web Operations → Server Operations: AMO Operations
QA Contact: cshields → oremj
This request is taking longer than 30 seconds to complete which is hitting both gunicorn and nginx timouts.

[jthomas@web1.addons.phx1 ~]$ time curl -H "Host: builer.addons.mozilla.org" http://127.0.0.1:10007/user/6265594/
curl: (52) Empty reply from server

real	0m30.833s
user	0m0.001s
sys	0m0.002s

I tested with a higher gunicorn timeout (120 seconds) which allowed the request to complete in 75 seconds. Should it take this long for this request to complete?
Assignee: server-ops → jthomas
(In reply to Jason Thomas [:jason] from comment #1)
> This request is taking longer than 30 seconds to complete which is hitting
> both gunicorn and nginx timouts.
> 
> [jthomas@web1.addons.phx1 ~]$ time curl -H "Host: builer.addons.mozilla.org"
> http://127.0.0.1:10007/user/6265594/
> curl: (52) Empty reply from server
> 
> real	0m30.833s
> user	0m0.001s
> sys	0m0.002s
> 
> I tested with a higher gunicorn timeout (120 seconds) which allowed the
> request to complete in 75 seconds. Should it take this long for this request
> to complete?

No.  If that's a QA account it probably has a million files it's trying to load or something.  This is a dev bug I'd suspect.
Assignee: jthomas → nobody
Component: Server Operations: AMO Operations → Add-on Builder
Product: mozilla.org → addons.mozilla.org
QA Contact: oremj
Version: other → unspecified
@wil, :D well maybe not a million, more like a few thousand :)

This has been stable lately - was any dev work done?
No.  I think we got new (faster?) servers on the backend
It looks like it's working
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Product: addons.mozilla.org → addons.mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: