Closed
Bug 794617
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
talos-r3-xp-ref does not have the correct _dumbwin32proc.py deployed
Categories
(Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard :: CIDuty, task, P2)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: armenzg, Assigned: armenzg)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [opsi])
Attachments
(1 file)
868 bytes,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
This means that it is not on the snapshot. This means that it is not on most re-imaged machines. At some point I tried setting the package as "setup" but as soon as one slave with the name "talos-r3-xp-ref" talks with OPSI it marks it as "installed". We should deploy it on the talos-r3-xp-ref machine and ask for IT to take a new snapshot and mark it as "always". "always" will ensure that every slave would be fixed. We can revert after that. C:\mozilla-build\msys\bin\md5sum.exe C:\mozilla-build\python25\Lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\_dumbwin32proc.py \e224dac9b2701239f9c182163c0bf23b *C:\\mozilla-build\\python25\\Lib\\site-packages\\twisted\\internet\\_dumbwin32proc.py Correct value: \434d35b728de5cb8fe96afcb9f9f34d9 *C:\\mozilla-build\ \python25\\Lib\\site-packages\\twisted\\internet\\_du mbwin32proc.py Armens-MacBook-Air:opsi-package-sources armenzg$ md5 twisted_dumbwin32proc/CLIENT_DATA/_dumbwin32proc.py MD5 (twisted_dumbwin32proc/CLIENT_DATA/_dumbwin32proc.py) = 434d35b728de5cb8fe96afcb9f9f34d9 Because every day we learn something new about OPSI.
Attachment #665122 -
Flags: feedback?(bhearsum)
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Armen Zambrano G. [:armenzg] from comment #0) > At some point I tried setting the package as "setup" but as soon as one > slave with the name "talos-r3-xp-ref" talks with OPSI it marks it as > "installed". Can you double check things like passwords and other recent changes to make sure the ref machine is fully up to date, too? > We should deploy it on the talos-r3-xp-ref machine and ask for IT to take a > new snapshot and mark it as "always". "always" will ensure that every slave > would be fixed. We can revert after that. Can't we just mark it for "setup" on each slave once? The slaves should be talking to OPSI under their own name at least once before they're in the production pool.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ben Hearsum [:bhearsum] from comment #1) > (In reply to Armen Zambrano G. [:armenzg] from comment #0) > > At some point I tried setting the package as "setup" but as soon as one > > slave with the name "talos-r3-xp-ref" talks with OPSI it marks it as > > "installed". > > Can you double check things like passwords and other recent changes to make > sure the ref machine is fully up to date, too? > The curse of who finds the problem first :) > > We should deploy it on the talos-r3-xp-ref machine and ask for IT to take a > > new snapshot and mark it as "always". "always" will ensure that every slave > > would be fixed. We can revert after that. > > Can't we just mark it for "setup" on each slave once? The slaves should be > talking to OPSI under their own name at least once before they're in the > production pool. Good point! We would still need to take the snapshot for the ref machine.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
I marked the package as "setup" for all XP slaves.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 665122 [details] [diff] [review] Install _dumbinw32proc.py always This patch is not needed anymore.
Attachment #665122 -
Flags: feedback?(bhearsum)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → armenzg
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P2
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
We're going to take a snapshot because re-imaged slaves have the old password and we want to grab the correct _dumbwin32proc.py. I have downloaded the file: C:\mozilla-build\msys\bin\md5sum.exe C:\mozilla-build\python25\Lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\_dumbwin32proc.py I also cleaned up the Desktop and created a ref_image_version.txt with this contents: > 20120528 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751109 > 20120927 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=794617 I think it is not a bad idea to keep track snapshots like this. This is documented in here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReferencePlatforms/Test/WinXP#Deployed_correct_dumbwin32proc.py_and_ref_image_version.txt ################## This can be determined by running this: * reg query "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon" /v DefaultPassword and this: C:\mozilla-build\msys\bin\md5sum.exe C:\mozilla-build\python25\Lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\_dumbwin32proc.py
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
This is fixed as IT took a snapshot.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Release Engineering → Infrastructure & Operations
Updated•4 years ago
|
Product: Infrastructure & Operations → Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•