Closed
Bug 798495
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
remove devtools sandbox running in b2g
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: General, defect, P1)
Firefox OS Graveyard
General
Tracking
(blocking-basecamp:+)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
blocking-basecamp | + |
People
(Reporter: justin.lebar+bug, Assigned: ttaubert)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [MemShrink:P2][slim:<1MB])
Along the same lines as bug 794228: It appears some devtools code is running in b2g: ├──19.30 MB (34.91%) -- js-non-window │ ├──12.29 MB (22.24%) -- compartments │ │ ├──11.22 MB (20.29%) -- non-window-global [...] │ │ │ └───0.61 MB (01.10%) ++ compartment([System Principal], [anonymous sandbox] (from: resource:///modules/devtools/dbg-server Is this intentional? If so, we need to remember to disable it in release builds.
If this is related to marionette, then it should be off unless explicitly enabled.
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
blocking-basecamp: --- → ?
Whiteboard: [MemShrink]
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
+dcamp Will disabling this affect the remote debugger?
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
jhford has a bug in B2G (https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/B2G/issues/84) to allow us to disable Marionette except for eng builds.
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
The remote debugger shouldn't be affected by disabling marionette; if you enable the remote debugger it will load the debugger server itself. Cc'ing past to make sure I'm telling the truth.
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Dave is right. Right now disabling marionette is actually a requirement for a working debugger (bug 764913).
Updated•12 years ago
|
blocking-basecamp: ? → +
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [MemShrink] → [MemShrink][slim:<1MB]
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [MemShrink][slim:<1MB] → [MemShrink:P2][slim:<1MB]
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Josh - Assigning to you to see if you can help out with this one. If not, feel free to reassing to nobody.
Assignee: nobody → josh
Priority: -- → P1
Summary: devtools sandbox running in b2g → remove devtools sandbox running in b2g
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
I will defer until I can actually dedicate time to it.
Assignee: josh → nobody
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
I'm pretty sure this has been fixed by bug 779984. The sandbox doesn't seem to exist in user builds. Can anyone confirm?
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
I don't see any memory used by a dbg-server compartment in a user build.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•