Closed
Bug 802361
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Do not delete xulrunner-sdk on each call to ./build.sh gecko or make -f client.mk build
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: GonkIntegration, defect)
Firefox OS Graveyard
GonkIntegration
Tracking
(blocking-basecamp:-)
RESOLVED
FIXED
| blocking-basecamp | - |
People
(Reporter: ochameau, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
It is really hard to work with b2g as everytime you run either
./build.sh gecko
or
make -C objdir
xulrunner-sdk used for gaia is deleted and re-downloaded again.
It is really frustrating as it is more than 300MB of download and takes a while to download.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #672032 -
Flags: review?(21)
| Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Summary: Do not stash xulrunner-sdk on each call to ./build.sh gecko or make -f client.mk build → Do not delete xulrunner-sdk on each call to ./build.sh gecko or make -f client.mk build
| Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
blocking-basecamp: --- → ?
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 672032 [details] [diff] [review]
Bug 802361: Do not delete xulrunner-sdk on make libs.
I'm unsure if the reason why this is needed. Let's ask the review to the original author.
Attachment #672032 -
Flags: review?(21) → review?(jhford)
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
So the original reason is that the Gaia project should be the thing that knows how to clean the Gaia repository. Unfortunately, the Gaia project builds with all of its files in-tree.
I think this is something that needs to be in the gaia makefile, not the mozilla-central makefile.
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
Let's have gaia know how to clean itself up
Attachment #672404 -
Flags: review?(21)
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 672404 [details] [diff] [review]
stop deleting xulrunner in clean target, add a really-clean target
This patch has some local changes that it shouldn't, I'm going to submit a pull request instead
Attachment #672404 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #672404 -
Flags: review?(21)
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
While this is a nice to have fix (and it looks like it'll get fixed very soon), we wouldn't hold the release of B2G v1 for it so I'm going to mark it not a blocker.
blocking-basecamp: ? → -
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
Attachment #672032 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #672032 -
Flags: review?(jhford)
Attachment #673151 -
Flags: review?(21)
Attachment #673151 -
Flags: review?(21) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
| Reporter | ||
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•