Closed Bug 805436 Opened 12 years ago Closed 12 years ago

SecReview: Mobile - support / provide APIs for Java Code in Addons

Categories

(mozilla.org :: Security Assurance: Review Request, task)

task
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: mgoodwin, Assigned: st3fan)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: [completed secreview])

Who is/are the point of contact(s) for this review?
Kartikaya Gupta (kats)

Please provide a short description of the feature / application (e.g. problem solved, use cases, etc.):
Add support for Java code in addons to Fennec.


Please provide links to additional information (e.g. feature page, wiki) if available and not yet included in feature description:
See bug 794479 and bug 799631.

Does this request block another bug? If so, please indicate the bug number
Yes, bug 799631

This review will be scheduled amongst other requested reviews. What is the urgency or needed completion date of this review?
Curtis, can I have the secreview slot on the 29th, please?

To help prioritize this work request, does this project support a goal specifically listed on this quarter's goal list? If so, which goal?
Not specifically, but part of this has already landed so we need to review ASAP.

Please answer the following few questions: (Note: If you are asked to describe anything, 1-2 sentences shall suffice.)
Does this feature or code change affect Firefox, Thunderbird or any product or service the Mozilla ships to end users?
 - Yes - Firefox for Android
Are there any portions of the project that interact with 3rd party services?
 - No.

Will your application/service collect user data? If so, please describe 
    If you feel something is missing here or you would like to provide other kind of feedback, feel free to do so here (no limits on size):
No.

Desired Date of review (if known from https://mail.mozilla.com/home/ckoenig@mozilla.com/Security%20Review.html) and whom to invite.
29th October. Please require kats and add mfinkle as an optional.
Stefan would like to take this review.
Assignee: mgoodwin → sarentz
Depends on: 785073
No longer depends on: 785073
Blocks: 785073
Setting the status to RESOLVED FIXED because we finished the discussion. Not yet to VERFIED FIXED because opinions differ on the subject and it is not clear what the actual result of this feature will be.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [pending secreview][start yyyy-mm-dd][target yyyy-mm-dd] → [completed secreview]
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.