Closed
Bug 813056
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Clock in landing page does not follow visual formatting
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Homescreen, defect, P2)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: pabloUX, Assigned: crdlc)
Details
(Whiteboard: visual design, incorrect implementation)
Attachments
(1 file)
|
188 bytes,
text/html
|
kaze
:
review+
sergiov
:
review+
vingtetun
:
approval-gaia-v1+
|
Details |
* Environment: Unagi, build (dev) from Friday 16 Nov.
* Repro: Clock displayed in landing page does not follow spec in formatting and size of type.
* Expected: Size of the clock is slightly smaller, AMPM format is smaller than time, alignment with date is refined.
* Actual: Numbers are bigger, AMPM format is same size as time, alignment with date is not to the left
| Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Whiteboard: UX_QA
| Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Component: Gaia → Gaia::Homescreen
| Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Whiteboard: UX_QA → VD
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
I implemented this view with Sergi, is it wrong Sergi? thanks
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
We don't have problems about alignment in code. View:
https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/blob/master/apps/homescreen/style/landing.css
It could be because of numbers and letters are different in the current font?... We can solve it adding a negative padding to clock in my opinion if you want
Regarding to AM/PM is more complicated, because I have to implement more code. Where are this wireframe?
Thanks
As @crdlc point this is correct in terms of sizing. I agree with the AM/PM, it was not intended to be used here. In any case i recommend to leave it as it is implemented right now. Pablo, can you upload a sample of the reference screen you're using to compare with the current build?
Updated•13 years ago
|
Keywords: polish
Summary: [Home/vd]: Clock in landing page does not follow visual formatting → Clock in landing page does not follow visual formatting
Whiteboard: VD → visual design
See link.
This is the correct size and format. Also the correct layout of the carrier. PLEASE ALSO NOTE this clock size and format should be carried across into landing page (currently does not).
This is the first page any user and reviewer will see. It has to be correct.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kbkcwpgadt8wjhl/OWD_00a_lock%201.png
Keywords: polish
Priority: -- → P1
Whiteboard: visual design → visual design, incorrect implementation
These are the changes we should implement in order to make the clock in the current build looks the same as in the design provided by Steve:
> Number zero used on the left of the hour should be removed from all cases when the clock is configured as 12h (we should use "7:35 AM" instead of "07:35 AM")
> Text style for clock numbers should be MozTT Light (font-weight:300), 28pt (6.3rem)
> Text style for "AM/PM" should be MozTT Light (font-weight:300), 17pt (3.8rem)
> Text style for the date should be MozTT Regular (font-weight:400), 7pt (1.6rem)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → crdlc
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
Number zero used on the left of the hour should be removed from all cases -> It was implemented here https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=805615
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
Attachment #685320 -
Flags: review?(21)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
This is Gaia running the patch: http://i.imgur.com/rH1aY.png
is it ok?
thanks
| Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #685320 -
Flags: review?(sergiov)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•13 years ago
|
||
Sergi, it's obvious, you don't need to read the code :) but I want that you review the screenshot linked in the previous comment
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•13 years ago
|
||
same hour than example in order to check better the sizes and paddings.
http://imgur.com/s06jJ
Comment 11•13 years ago
|
||
Font sizes are ok.
We should adjust some paddings:
The distance between the status bar and the clock should be 45px (now it's 33px).
The distance from the right edge of the screen to the clock should be 25px (now it's 15px).
The distance between the hour and date should be 12px (now it's 14px).
I'd move the date 1px to the left so it's better aligned with the clock.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 12•13 years ago
|
||
Following that rules
http://i.imgur.com/KWFUN.png
thanks
Comment 13•13 years ago
|
||
In terms of font sizing and paddings i think it's ok.
In regard of the font shadow i think it's stronger than the one used in the visuals. Although i think it's better using a stronger shadow because it's possible to see the hour when the background image has bright/light colors. But that's my opinion.
I have a concern regarding the top padding of the clock when in the landing page. Although the implementation by @crdlc is correct and perfectly matches the visuals, i feel like the distance to the status bar is too tall. This is because we must use exactly the same position for the clock as we are using in the lock screen, but in the lock screen we have an extra component on top of the clock, which is the carrier info and a divider line. What do you think?
| Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #685320 -
Flags: review?(21) → review?(kaze)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 14•13 years ago
|
||
Kaze if you want to review this pr as you sais me before... ;) It is about a new design of the clock in the landing page. The design has been reviewed by UX guys but you could review how I implemented it, thanks a lot!!!
Attachment #685320 -
Flags: review?(sergiov) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 15•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 685320 [details]
New format v1
NOTE: If blocking-basecamp+ is set, just land it for now.
[Approval Request Comment]
Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): new design
User impact if declined: legacy design
Testing completed: Tim, Sergi and Kaze reviewed this
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): IMHO nothing
Attachment #685320 -
Flags: approval-gaia-master?(21)
Comment 16•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 685320 [details]
New format v1
Sounds limited scope for me.
Attachment #685320 -
Flags: approval-gaia-master?(21) → approval-gaia-master+
Comment 17•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 685320 [details]
New format v1
https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/db77ce33e3041762ac466e6585ff4ab68df7f795
Attachment #685320 -
Flags: review?(kaze) → review+
Updated•13 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•