Closed
Bug 825123
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
[Settings][Cellular&Data] Not able to get data connection and not able to automatically fetch "Data settings" when roaming
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: General, defect)
Tracking
(blocking-b2g:-, blocking-basecamp:-, b2g18+)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
b2g18 | + | --- |
People
(Reporter: wachen, Unassigned)
Details
(Whiteboard: [triaged:1/18])
2012-12-27 date build from pvt server STR: 0. make sure you have a foreign data plan sim 1. turn on the phone 2. go to "Settings" app 3. go to "Cellular & Data" 4. turn on "Data connection" & "Data Roaming" 5. go to "Data settings" expected result: a. "adb logcat -b Radio" it, you will see some action in step 4 b. It should get data settings of current roaming service provider from database in step 5 actual result: a. "adb logcat -b Radio" it, you will see nothing in step 4 b. There is no information in data settings in step 5
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: --- → shira?
blocking-basecamp: --- → ?
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
blocking-basecamp: ? → ---
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
just another comment that I was using China Mobile sim card for this one. not able to check using other sim card.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Summary: [Settings][Cellular&Data] Not able to get data connection and not able to get Data settings when roaming → [Settings][Cellular&Data] Not able to get data connection and not able to automatically fetch "Data settings" when roaming
Updated•12 years ago
|
Component: General → Gaia::Settings
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Could be related to bug 825075.
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Tried an AT&T SIM card with Walter. Things seems to work well with AT&T SIM. It seems to be a problem with not having a APN settings in our database for China Mobile
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Per discussion with Kaze, the APN settings are retrieved base on MCC/MNC from SIM card. The China Mobile SIM card been tested has a strange MCC/MNC. So this issue could be related to SIM card. I/Gecko ( 832): RIL Worker: Handling parcel as REQUEST_SIM_IO I/Gecko ( 832): RIL Worker: AD: 0, 0, 0, I/Gecko ( 832): RIL Worker: MCC: 204 MNC: 17924
Component: Gaia::Settings → General
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Nice MNC. :-) Note that you could add a specific setting for this operator in the /shared/resources/apn/apn_confs_local.xml file and rebuild apn.json accordingly. We already had to do it for a Canadian operator.
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
FTR, we have China Mobile entries in apn.json for MCC=460.
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Hi Kaze, Thanks for the info! Hi Yoshi, It seems MNC value was not correctly parsed due to missing MNC length information. I/Gecko ( 832): -*- RadioInterfaceLayer: Received message from worker: {"isDisplayNetworkNameRequired":false,"isDisplaySpnRequired":true,"rilMessageType":"iccinfochange","imsi":"204043004929951","iccid":"89860312710103107205","ad":{"0":0,"1":0,"2":0},"mcc":204,"mnc":17924,"sst":{"0":255,"1":63,"2":255,"3":15,"4":63,"5":0,"6":60,"7":243,"8":0,"9":12},"spn":"ä¸å<9b>½ç<94>µä¿¡"}
(In reply to Shian-Yow Wu from comment #7) "imsi":"204043004929951", "ad":{"0":0,"1":0,"2":0}, AD is mandatory EF and should not be 0 and should have at least 4 octets.
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
If it's SIM card problem, should we mark this bug as RESOLVED/WONTFIX?
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Shian-Yow Wu from comment #9) > If it's SIM card problem, should we mark this bug as RESOLVED/WONTFIX? better error handling? i believe it's a commercial SIM that's tested
blocking-basecamp: --- → ?
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
This doesn't sound like a blocker but getting better error handling is something that would be nice so please request uplift when a patch is ready.
blocking-basecamp: ? → -
tracking-b2g18:
--- → +
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Shian-Yow Wu from comment #9) > If it's SIM card problem, should we mark this bug as RESOLVED/WONTFIX? I think we still need to fix it. Just it won't be a urgent case. And, we might need to have better error handling since we don't know what other phone companies' sim card would do. (It happened to CHT phone company in TW before that it's affecting bluetooth. I think bluetooth gecko/gaia team did fix it.)
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
Just btw, China Unicom mobile phone service provider's sim card is working fine.
Updated•11 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: shira? → -
Whiteboard: [triaged:1/18]
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•11 years ago
|
||
Any news on this one?
Comment 15•11 years ago
|
||
Yoshi, do you think we can do better error handling on this?
Flags: needinfo?(allstars.chh)
I dont see any error from RIL. Why do you keep saying "error handling"?
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(allstars.chh)
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Marking as WONTFIX as it's defect on the SIM. Also we haven't heard any China partner report this problem in these 3 months.
Reporter | ||
Comment 18•11 years ago
|
||
There is no China partner reporting this because this is a ROAMING issue. And, for all the same company SIM card would act the same (means 1/4 of China mobile provider). Please reconsider to do a better handling?
(In reply to Walter Chen from comment #18) > There is no China partner reporting this because this is a ROAMING issue. Operators have their machines worth million dollars to test that, so they don't need to travel around the world. > And, for all the same company SIM card would act the same (means 1/4 of > China mobile provider). Please reconsider to do a better handling? You need to discuss with the operator first. From your previous log, their SIMs doesn't have a mandatory field called EF_AD. That's defined by 3GPP spec. Without the spec we nor modem vendor have no idea how to read those values. That's why I say it's a defect on that SIM. An example is if you don't have a SIM card inserted in your phone, you cannot call your friends. In this case, the SIM doesn't have EF_AD in it so RIL doesn't know how to retrieve those MCC/MNC. Before we have one similar issue like this, the SIM from one of our partners doesn't have voice mail stored in it. (Although in that case , voice mail is optional). After we discuss with the partner, they responded immediately their SIMs don't support this. Please provide a better reason or information for us to proceed, or even correct me if I got wrong in my analysis, if you still want to fix bug.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•