Tracking for investigation?
We're driving people to AMO for theme support in 19, so we'd like to make sure this is resolved before that goes to release.
This problem still exist. I am not sure it is a dup of the other one. This is a pretty serious UI issue - it is basically the first thing I see when I want to install an add-on.
19 has already shipped, renominating for tracking
Chris - we still this happening during page load, which can take a few seconds. Is there something we can do to make the layout happen faster? It looks bad since AMO is really the front-door for add-ons in Fennec.
Previously there was a FOUC that was attributed to a Fennec bug (bug 759678). We're now inlining all of our CSS in a <style> as part of bug 721523. We tried reverting it but we noticed another visual bug (not sure if it's related to the original Fennec bugs, but was not reproducible on stock browser). So we're back to the inline <style>. There are not even HTTP requests for our CSS at all now and data URIs for most icons - we're pulling in just a few images for add-on icons/previews. That aside, sure thing - let me look into into seeing what we can do with the header text. That's not really acceptable on our end.
https://github.com/mozilla/zamboni/commit/b4c56ec Mark, the overlapping text was from the `alt` attribute text on the `<img>`. There must've been a CDN issue when resolving that image. I've removed the `alt` text and changed the heading to say "Add-ons" instead of "Mobile Add-ons" so there's no wrapping. Thanks for your bringing it to our attention - and let me know if there's anything else! (This will go live in about an hour with our weekly push.)
I still see the overlapping text on-load for a second, it resolves but it's still visible.
Aaron, Krupa - thanks. The original screenshot showed just the detail page; I forgot we show the same logo with `alt` text ont homepage as well. I've fixed it there as well now! This is on -dev and will go to prod later today. https://github.com/mozilla/zamboni/commit/8a5593c
It looks better now. But can we have the logo next to the header please?
(In reply to krupa raj 82[:krupa] from comment #14) > It looks better now. But can we have the logo next to the header please? Cvan fixed this. Thanks!