Closed
Bug 829825
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Browser causes space between td's after default set to zero
Categories
(Core :: SVG, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: robert, Assigned: xidorn)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression, testcase)
Attachments
(3 files)
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0 Build ID: 20130104151948 Steps to reproduce: Viewed TD with no padding no border and showed white border around images in a td. Actual results: It showed white border between images with td. See Screenshot See red highlighted region http://cl.ly/image/123h0L0M0L12 But the white space flickers on and off when you re-size the browser window. See dev site and scroll to Meet our Surgeons to see issue. http://dal.32spokes.com/ Expected results: No spaces between the tds. See screenshot http://cl.ly/image/0K0W233B0Q3o. I have also checked this on Chrome, IE and no issue appears at all.
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Please provide code, ideally a minimized test case that shows the issue.
(In reply to Kevin Brosnan [:kbrosnan] from comment #1) > Please provide code, ideally a minimized test case that shows the issue. I have already provided a page where you can see the issue. http://dal.32spokes.com/ You can see all the CSS and HTML code I have used from there. This only happens in the FF browser. Not sure why I would need to take the time out to replicate the issue on another page when it only affects FF browser.
![]() |
||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
This is a Regression between (at least) Firefox 14 vs 17.
Keywords: regressionwindow-wanted
OS: Mac OS X → All
![]() |
||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
Regression window(m-c) Good: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/6dae57cd2f85 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 ID:20120720145842 Bad: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/045c11dd41a6 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 ID:20120720205642 Pushlog: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=6dae57cd2f85&tochange=045c11dd41a6 Regression window(m-i) Good: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/a746aaa32b22 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 ID:20120720114508 Bad: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/62f19ed60528 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 ID:20120720115241 Pushlog: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?fromchange=a746aaa32b22&tochange=62f19ed60528 Suspected; Bug 614723
Blocks: 614723
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
status-firefox18:
--- → affected
status-firefox-esr17:
--- → affected
tracking-firefox19:
--- → ?
tracking-firefox20:
--- → ?
tracking-firefox21:
--- → ?
Component: Untriaged → SVG
Ever confirmed: true
Keywords: regressionwindow-wanted → regression
Product: Firefox → Core
Version: 18 Branch → 17 Branch
![]() |
||
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
If you disable #surgeon-rl td a:link img.desaturate { filter: url("inc/desaturate.svg#greyscale"); } in the Inspector the Issue of the White Gap is gone.
![]() |
||
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
And the gap depend on browser width.
Updated•11 years ago
|
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
We'd accept a low risk fix here, but do not feel the need to track for upcoming releases given this is a regression in FF17 (unreported until 1.5 months after its release).
Hi… I filed this report as I didn't see it disappear on the latest update… Also I tend to think if your not part of the solution your part of the problem… Also if the client mentions that they see the issue I can verify it isn't my HTML and CSS but the browser itself. I hope to see it fixed at some point… (It would be over my head and knowledge as to how) But I do agree it isn't a huge priority.
![]() |
||
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Thanks for reporting the issue, RDall.
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
[adding "testcase-wanted" -- ideally it'd be great to have a testcase attached to this bug page, so that we can still test this in case the remote site ends up changing at some point]
Keywords: testcase-wanted
![]() |
||
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
It looks like the gap appears at alternate pixels of browser width. No gap when browser is N pixels wide; gap when it's N+1 pixels; no gap at N+2; gap at N+3, etc
Keywords: testcase-wanted → testcase
Hardware: x86 → All
![]() |
||
Comment 13•10 years ago
|
||
A 260.99 KB zip file isn't my idea of a reduced testcase. ;) I don't have time to reduce it right now, but if someone else does that and attaches a (say, less than 1 KB unzipped) testcase, then I'm much more likely to be able to take a look at the issue.
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•10 years ago
|
||
I am a little surprised this is still open after almost 9 months. Can we get a refresh on this ticket???
Comment 15•10 years ago
|
||
If you want to help, comment 13 suggests that a more reduced testcase would be appreciated.
![]() |
||
Comment 16•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jonathan Watt [:jwatt] from comment #13) > A 260.99 KB zip file isn't my idea of a reduced testcase. ;) I don't have > time to reduce it right now, but if someone else does that and attaches a > (say, less than 1 KB unzipped) testcase, then I'm much more likely to be > able to take a look at the issue. ???
Reporter | ||
Comment 17•10 years ago
|
||
Test case size seems fine to me… As I have said previously fixing the issue is well over my head as I am just a web designer… But I was going through an old email and I found the bug ticket so I though I would check the status and saw it wasn't closed or even assigned.
![]() |
||
Comment 18•10 years ago
|
||
This seems to be WORKSFORME now on Nightly.
![]() |
||
Comment 19•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jonathan Watt [:jwatt] from comment #18) > This seems to be WORKSFORME now on Nightly. Confirmed. Also WFM against Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 ID:20130831004004 CSet: 9dd5f0e7f716
![]() |
||
Comment 20•10 years ago
|
||
![]() |
||
Comment 21•10 years ago
|
||
I cannot reproduce in Aurora25.0a2 and later. Fixed window(m-i) Bad: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/b4402b6dba21 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20130724 Firefox/25.0 ID:20130724055940 Fixed: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/74633f25ca05 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20130724 Firefox/25.0 ID:20130724060938 Pushlg: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?fromchange=b4402b6dba21&tochange=74633f25ca05 Fixed by: 517eaa8ba87e Xidorn Quan — Bug 786254 - SVG effects rendering doesn't pixel snap, causing faint vertical lines appear on some tabs. r=roc
status-firefox22:
--- → affected
status-firefox23:
--- → affected
status-firefox25:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox26:
--- → unaffected
tracking-firefox24:
--- → ?
Depends on: 786254
Updated•10 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
![]() |
||
Comment 22•10 years ago
|
||
Thanks, Alice.
Comment 23•10 years ago
|
||
Probably late in the game to request uplift to beta for Fx24, but you can always ask in bug 786254. Looks like the patch is pretty simple and comes with a test.
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM UTC-4] from comment #23) > Probably late in the game to request uplift to beta for Fx24, but you can > always ask in bug 786254. Looks like the patch is pretty simple and comes > with a test. How can I request the uplift? I really hope the bug can be fixed in release version ASAP since it affects my everyday use.
Comment 25•10 years ago
|
||
Request beta approval on the patch in the bug and answer the questions it asks you.
Comment 26•10 years ago
|
||
This should be resolved starting firefox 25 hence wontfixing Fx24 given we could not uplift https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786254 in our last two beta's left on Fx24.
Comment 27•10 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 Verified as fixed on Firefox 25 beta 1 (20130917123208).
Comment 28•10 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 Verified as fixed on latest Aurora 26.0a2 (buildID: 20131003004003).
Keywords: verifyme
Updated•10 years ago
|
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•