Closed
Bug 830527
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
[Cost Control] Dates in Cost Control application are not localizable
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Cost Control, defect)
Tracking
(blocking-b2g:tef+, b2g18 fixed, b2g18-v1.0.0 fixed)
VERIFIED
FIXED
blocking-b2g | tef+ |
People
(Reporter: stas, Assigned: arcturus)
Details
(Keywords: l12y, late-l10n, Whiteboard: [EU_TPE_TRIAGED][triaged:1/15])
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
The chart in the cost control app has uses dates to annotate the horizontal axis. The format is not localizable. See attached screenshot.
Updated•12 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: tef? → tef+
Whiteboard: [EU_TPE_TRIAGED]
Summary: Dates in the chart labels are not localizable → [Cost Control] Dates in the chart labels are not localizable
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → salva
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [EU_TPE_TRIAGED] → [EU_TPE_TRIAGED][triaged:1/15]
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #703283 -
Flags: review?(salva)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #703283 -
Flags: review?(stas)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 703283 [details]
Pointer to GitHub PR 7665
Adding Kaze as reviewer as he has some input for this patch
Attachment #703283 -
Flags: review?(kaze)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
New version on github with comments from Kaze added.
Salva we modified the format to '%b %e' to avoid dates like 'FEB 01', if that was on purpose, please let me know and will amend the commit.
Thanks folks!
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 703283 [details]
Pointer to GitHub PR 7665
Stealing review from stas.
Can you make the comment on the dateformat include a link to http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/strftime.html ? Then localizers don't need to remember that link from elsewhere.
I didn't dive into the details of the flow, is the l10n data loaded for sure when that code is triggered?
Also, the upperCase is concerning me. Do we *really* want that? We just removed the text transform elsewhere, but didn't dive into js ways of doing the same thing.
Clearing the review request, this isn't much of an r- or r+, but a few things for the fellow reviewers to take into account.
Attachment #703283 -
Flags: review?(stas)
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Rewording to clarify the nature of the bug and solve it once for all.
Summary: [Cost Control] Dates in the chart labels are not localizable → [Cost Control] Dates in Cost Control application are not localizable
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 703283 [details]
Pointer to GitHub PR 7665
Axel, I'm asking you again for review cause we modified the scope, not just a single piece, but all the missing l10n for cost control.
Thanks
Attachment #703283 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 703283 [details]
Pointer to GitHub PR 7665
I think from an l10n pov this looks OK, relying on the other reviewers for the actual code pieces.
Attachment #703283 -
Flags: review?(l10n) → review+
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 703283 [details]
Pointer to GitHub PR 7665
The `short-date-format' l10n entity doesn’t look right, see my comments on github. Feel free to r? me when your PR is updated.
Attachment #703283 -
Flags: review?(kaze) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 703283 [details]
Pointer to GitHub PR 7665
PR updated with requested changes.
Thanks guys!
Attachment #703283 -
Flags: review- → review?(kaze)
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #703283 -
Flags: review?(salva) → review+
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #703831 -
Flags: review?(francisco.jordano)
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 703831 [details]
Removing NO-SIM scenario due to lack of madurity
It has been necessary to bump some l10n strings. As they are used dynamically on code, this code has been modified as well.
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Salvador de la Puente González [:salva] from comment #12)
> Comment on attachment 703831 [details]
> Removing NO-SIM scenario due to lack of madurity
>
> It has been necessary to bump some l10n strings. As they are used
> dynamically on code, this code has been modified as well.
salva, attach that PR over in bug 831274?
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 703831 [details]
Removing NO-SIM scenario due to lack of madurity
Please, can someone delete this attachment. It is missplaced.
Attachment #703831 -
Flags: review?(francisco.jordano)
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 703831 [details]
Removing NO-SIM scenario due to lack of madurity
Not a real patch for this bug, just a tragic error ;)
Attachment #703831 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 703283 [details]
Pointer to GitHub PR 7665
Thanks for the fixes! :-)
Attachment #703283 -
Flags: review?(kaze) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•12 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•12 years ago
|
status-b2g18:
--- → fixed
Comment 18•12 years ago
|
||
Verified fixed in pvt b2g18 user build.
Gaia:
Rev 7cacbcb8042b49d816a34de8e9767dcedefa6d84
B-D 2013-01-25 02:57:10
Gecko: http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g18/rev/32c2cc3e19ff
BuildID 20130124140859
Version 18.0
The format of data in different lang looks like a different lang for me.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
OS: Linux → Gonk (Firefox OS)
Hardware: x86_64 → ARM
Comment 19•12 years ago
|
||
Landed on mozilla-b2g18/gaia master prior to the 1/25 branching to mozilla-b2g18_v1_0_0/v1.0.0, updating status-b2g-v1.0.0 to fixed.
status-b2g18-v1.0.0:
--- → fixed
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•