Closed
Bug 83458
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
Update Accept: header
Categories
(Core :: Networking: HTTP, defect)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
mozilla0.9.1
People
(Reporter: gerv, Assigned: gerv)
Details
(Whiteboard: Please check me in, someone)
Attachments
(1 file)
|
932 bytes,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
The conclusion in n.p.m.netlib was that the Accept header should be:
Accept: text/xml, application/xml, application/xhtml+xml,
text/html;q=0.9, image/png, image/mng, image/jpeg,
image/gif;q=0.2, text/plain;q=0.8, text/css, */*;q=0.1
(I've tweaked it to save another byte.)
This seems to cover most of the bases while not being unduly long.
Currently, and for 0.9.1, MNG support has regressed due to the imglib2 landing,
so that needs to be left out, leaving:
Accept: text/xml, application/xml, application/xhtml+xml,
text/html;q=0.9, image/png, image/jpeg,
image/gif;q=0.2, text/plain;q=0.8, text/css, */*;q=0.1
Thanks to earlier work, this is now merely a case of updating a pref. It would
be good to check this in before the branch, to save hassle.
Gerv
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
Looking for r= from darin@netscape.com or anyone who happens to be trawling the
0.9.1 buglist, rs= and a=from brendan@mozilla.org and so on.
I would emphasise that this change is the result of a discussion about the
optimum Accept: header in n.p.m.netlib.
Gerv
(Guardian of the Accept Header)
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9.1
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
r=darin
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
r=bbaetz
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
I never seem to be awake when the tree is open. Any passing kind person has
my permission to check this in on both trunk and branch, to get it off the 0.9.1
buglist.
Gerv
| Assignee | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Whiteboard: Please check me in, someone
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
Are either of those r= really rs= or sr=?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
darin is a super-reviewer, so I assumed so.
For goodness sake, this is a one-line patch. It's not like it needs much poring
over. If n.p.m.netlib have signed off on it, and Darin has signed off on it, and
Bradley has signed off on it, and Asa has signed off on it, I think that's
probably enough oversight.
Gerv
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
Checked in on branch and trunk.
Gerv
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
VERIFIED via ethereal on linux, and by checking all.js on both trunk and branch
(2001060713)
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•