Closed
Bug 83775
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Ability to share folders among accounts
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: MailNews: Message Display, enhancement)
SeaMonkey
MailNews: Message Display
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: dneri98, Unassigned)
Details
Build 2001-06-01-04, Win2k sp2 Behavior: I have two POP accounts, and I notice there are draft/template/sent/trash folders for each account. Are these necessary? Only one outgoing mail server is defined. IMO, these should be shared folders for all accounts. It's also debatable whether or not the inbox should be shared as well. This is currently how Outlook handles it (yuck, I said the O-word). So we should make it a user option whether to share an accounts folders with the main set or create an individual set for that account only. Example case: Say I have 3 accounts (god forbid). The first two accounts have the same domain but different user names, and I want them to share folders (i.e. work email). But say I also have another account (i.e. home email) that I want to check as well, but don't want them to be combined with work email. So for that account, I would have it create its own, unshared folders. I would thus have two folder sets. But if I have two home accounts at home, I only want one folder set to appear since, IMO, they should be combined. One more thing, what exactly is the use of the Local Folders folder? To me, this is just a third copy of unused folders.
I know this has little priority right now so sorry to add more to the mix... I realized I didn't update the OS/Platform to all, so changing. Also changing severity to minor for now.
Severity: normal → minor
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Hardware: PC → All
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
Marking NEW changing severity and description.
Severity: minor → enhancement
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Summary: Unnecessary duplicate folders → [RFE] Ability to share folders among accounts
Updated•22 years ago
|
Summary: [RFE] Ability to share folders among accounts → Ability to share folders among accounts
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
Hi, I'm a recent convert from OE (the new Bayesian spam filters won me over), and I also do have 3 POP accounts. I am looking forward to this RFE very much. I just wanted to add that I definitely would appreciate the option of having separate inboxes for each account, even if the other folders are shared. In OE I created these using user defined folders and filters. I suppose I could do the same in Mozilla, but there is one catch: the inbox is a "special" folder in that it can't be deleted. In OE I once accidentally deleted one of my user defined "inbox" folders when I meant to delete just one of the messages in the folder (I find it easy to mix up whether the folder or the currently displayed message has the focus in the three pane model). Then of course I emptied the trash before I realized what I had done. I personally only care to have the option of excluding the inbox when sharing folders in multiple accounts, but perhaps other users would want to be able to exclude other pre-defined folders as well? It might be very slick if you could arbitrarily exclude a folder via that folders properties dialog. An excluded folder would just be prepended with the account name. If one were to exclude the Inbox and the Templates folders it would look like so: - Mail - Home Inbox - Home2 Inbox - Work Inbox - Unsent Messages - Drafts - Home Templates - Home2 Templates - Work Templates - Sent - Junk - Trash - MyArchive I am not sure though how you would integrate this suggestion with Dwayne's of being able to merge the folders of some accounts but not others?. . . - Mail - Home & Home2 Inbox - Work Inbox - Unsent Messages [...] Regards, Ian
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
i've gotta vote for reducing the mailbox/folder clutter too. i've got FIVE accounts i check regularly, and each one of them has a trash, a templates folder and a drafts folder (not to mention in box). this is excessive, because they don't get used! i have the option turned on to store drafts and templates in the 'local folders' version of these. if you've got two accounts maybe it makes sense, but i can't even see the entire list of folders on my 19" monitor!
I guess bug #208443 is similar to this one.
Flags: blocking-aviary1.0+
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
please don't plus bugs for the release. That is the job of the delivery teams. Doing so may cause you to lose your bug priveleges. Please use a global inbox if you are a pop user and you only want one set of folders.
Flags: blocking-aviary1.0+ → blocking-aviary1.0-
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Updated•19 years ago
|
Assignee: sspitzer → mail
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee: mail → nobody
QA Contact: esther → message-display
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state. If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way. If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar). If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state. Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Status: NEW → UNCONFIRMED
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state. If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way. If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar). If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state. Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state. If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way. If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar). If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state. Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state. If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way. If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar). If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state. Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state. If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way. If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar). If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state. Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 13•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state. If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way. If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar). If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state. Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 14•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state. If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way. If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar). If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state. Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 15•15 years ago
|
||
SM did get the Global Inbox feature.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•15 years ago
|
Resolution: FIXED → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•