Closed
Bug 838025
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
[System][User Story] Call waiting with Bluetooth headset
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::System, defect, P1)
Tracking
(blocking-b2g:-)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
| blocking-b2g | - |
People
(Reporter: pdol, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: feature)
UCID: Bluetooth-013
User Story:
As a user that is currently on a phone call using a Bluetooth headset, I want to be able to answer another incoming call from the headset, placing the first call on hold.
Updated•13 years ago
|
Summary: [B2G][System][User Story] Call waiting with Bluetooth headset → [System][User Story] Call waiting with Bluetooth headset
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Hi Peter - Casey checked with the developers and the support seems to be in place for:
1) Hanging up current call and answering new call
2) Holding current call and answering new call.
This is determined by the headsets button configuration.
Based on this, can we close this story / bug?
- Rob
Flags: needinfo?(pdolanjski)
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
Do we need to verify on a particular Bluetooth headset? I have a Plantronics and a Jabra headset ATM.
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
I tested the use cases in Comment 1 and I can report the following - this testing was done with the latest nightly build on unagi.
*Hanging up current call and answering new call
**Worked with Plantronics Marque 2 headset but not with Jabra headset. The Jabra headset did not give me an audible signal for the second incoming call.
*Holding current call and answering new call
**Worked with Plantronics Marque 2 headset, but not with Jabra headset. The Jabra headset did not give me an audible signal for the second incoming call.
Note that the Jabra headset is a lower end headset - http://jabra.com/Products/Bluetooth/JABRA_TALK/Jabra_TALK.
Plantronics headset: http://www.plantronics.com/us/product/m165
Removing QAWanted as Marcia tested. Thanks Marcia!
Keywords: qawanted
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
QA team, how do you want to handle closing out features like this?
It clearly works on some headsets.
Should we close out this feature bug and allow additional bugs to be raised for specific headsets that do not work?
Flags: needinfo?(pdolanjski)
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Peter Dolanjski from comment #6)
> QA team, how do you want to handle closing out features like this?
> It clearly works on some headsets.
> Should we close out this feature bug and allow additional bugs to be raised
> for specific headsets that do not work?
That sounds right to me.
Whiteboard: u=user c=bluetooth s=v1.1-sprint-1 → u=cyee@mozilla.com c=bluetooth s=v1.1-sprint-1
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Peter Dolanjski [:pdol] from comment #6)
> QA team, how do you want to handle closing out features like this?
> It clearly works on some headsets.
> Should we close out this feature bug and allow additional bugs to be raised
> for specific headsets that do not work?
Should we still include this one into the scope of v1.1.0?
Thanks.
Updated•13 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: leo+ → leo?
Comment 9•13 years ago
|
||
Comment #6 is correct - file bugs for individual headsets confirmed to not work, and nominate those for blocking.
Product team: we need a framework for evaluating things like this. Eg: "for country X, Firefox OS should support these top 5 headsets for sale in that market, as specified by the carrier partner".
blocking-b2g: leo? → -
Comment 10•13 years ago
|
||
And closing per previous comment.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Updated•13 years ago
|
Flags: in-moztrap?
Updated•13 years ago
|
Flags: in-moztrap?
Updated•13 years ago
|
Flags: in-moztrap-
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•