Closed
Bug 841523
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Testing refunds
Categories
(Marketplace Graveyard :: Payments/Refunds, defect, P2)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
2013-05-16
People
(Reporter: andy+bugzilla, Assigned: keir)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [ETA 4/12])
In bug 835415 I asked about operators that support refunds. What I'd really like is an operator in the *test* environment that supports refunds. That way we can test the whole flow of how a refund works, without having to fake it all our end. Currently you get all the way to the refund button and when you click it we get an error: NOT_SUPPORTED, No refund agent found Thats fine, but this makes testing hard.
Updated•11 years ago
|
Blocks: marketplace-payments
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: sruston → keir
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Keir, as per my Skype IM can you let us know which operators in test support refunds?
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Version: 1.1 → 1.2
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P2
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: keir → tom
None of them support auto refunds. Also, there would be no point testing if one did because it probably wouldn't work the same for operators that we are dealing with for launch.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
So can we get a example or test operator on the test server that behaves similarly to the ones we are going to launch with?
So have you connected to our refund API? If you have then it will connect to TestPay and send back a not_supported error which relates to operator not supported but we cannot put any operators in until Spain have confirmed refunds is working.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Yes it does. We can't do refunds for operators in the test instances until they confirm its working in production?
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Andy McKay [:andym] from comment #3) > So can we get a example or test operator on the test server that behaves > similarly to the ones we are going to launch with? So the current behaviour (ie returning "NOT_SUPPORT" to a request for a refund of type OPERATOR) is the same as the launch operators (ie they don't support refunds back to bill). The alternative is to do a refund of type "BANGO" - which will refund back to the users "bango balance" (and will be used for future purchases - but wont prompt any further action (ie a "manual refund back to bill")). This is not ideal as its not likely to be 100% clear to the user. I can add a refund agent to testpay so you can test OPERATOR refunds (but as Tom said v few operators actually have API that can refund back to bill)?
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
If we've got a testpay operator that can support refunds that would be awesome. Then there is a way of testing and ensuring that we can do end to end testing of the flow without having to wait to test it on produciton.
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
should be in test by 11th March
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: tom → keir
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
still in development, priority has been resolving test blocking issues
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [ETA: week of 3/25]
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
Bango has run into some troubles on this. They are estimating the work to do and will return with a new time estimate.
Whiteboard: [ETA: week of 3/25]
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [ETA 4/12]
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
dev work done, testing config prior to deployment
Comment 13•11 years ago
|
||
likely to be in build 18th April
Comment 14•11 years ago
|
||
won't be in Test till 24th April
Comment 15•11 years ago
|
||
part of Direct Billing 4 (DB4) now scheduled for 30th April
Comment 16•11 years ago
|
||
Currently in test
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•11 years ago
|
||
This is on test now, and it wont be moved to production I'm going to close this bug.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•11 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → 2013-05-16
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•