Closed
Bug 841832
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Awesomebar should not match "pixels" in image titles
Categories
(Firefox :: Address Bar, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: josh, Unassigned)
Details
Typing the keyword "pixel" produces a long list of matches, most of which consist of directly viewed images with titles like "image.png (PNG image, 248 x 50 pixels)". If I type "pixel" or "pixels", I don't want to match automatically generated image titles; I want to match real pages with "pixel" in the title or URL.
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Are there any other such keywords that are specially seen by Firefox currently?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
I can still reproduce this issue in Firefox 57.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Version: 18 Branch → 57 Branch
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
It's unclear how we could recognize actual titles from made-up titles, and without that important detail this is not actionable.
At a maximum we could give more importance to the first N chars in the title... but that's not a solution.
And even if we special cased the "pixel" case, there are probably hundreds other cases, so it's not manageable.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
Would it not be possible for code that generates synthetic titles for things like images to flag those titles as such in the awesomebar's database, alongside the other frecency information, and then avoid matching text typed into the awesomebar against those synthetic titles?
We don't need to "recognize" those titles at match time; we could explicitly flag them when inserted.
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
yes, but it would cover a single case, and some user may actually find valuable to search for "pixel" the same way you find it pointless. Without some kind of measurement I really can't tell, and that kind of measurement is more costly than the final benefit...
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
"pixel" would match literally every image ever browsed to; hard to see how that would have any value. In my case, I was trying to find a specific page that talked about pixel art, and this issue made it get lost in the noise.
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
well, for example you could write pixel and some other keyword to look for a specific image
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•