Closed
Bug 843533
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
add support for tp5o to talos
Categories
(Testing :: Talos, defect)
Testing
Talos
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: jmaher, Assigned: jmaher)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
1.80 KB,
patch
|
k0scist
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
seriously considering the option of a reduced set of pages for tp5, I want to create tp5o as a staging ground for this experiment, and eventually being a final solution.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
we need to ensure we don't post these results to graph server, but datazilla is fine.
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
What does the 'o' stand for? :-)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
o = n++
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Ah :-)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
fixed some test definitions and verified this works great on try server (using another hack)
Attachment #716536 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #716536 -
Flags: review?(jhammel)
Attachment #717053 -
Flags: review?(jhammel)
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ed Morley [:edmorley UTC+0] from comment #4)
> Ah :-)
Yeah ....the whole test suite name carrying meaning is a bit problematic in the existing system.
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 717053 [details] [diff] [review]
add support for tp5o into talos harness (1.1)
+ if 'tp5o' in result:
+ return
Why?
+class tp5o(tp):
Is it necessary to repeat all the things? Also, the docstring should probably be updated with a description of tp5o vs just copying the tp5 docstring.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
we can't push tp5o results to graph server, otherwise we will have to deploy new sql logic and bits and there could be reported regressions although this is an experimental target at the moment.
Good call on the pointless copying of tp5n stuff.
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 717053 [details] [diff] [review]
add support for tp5o into talos harness (1.1)
+ if 'tp5o' in result:
+ return
There should be a comment here, apropos comment 7 and comment 8 probably referencing this bug number.
+class tp5o(tp):
+ """
Please fix the docstring and please only copy what is intended to be copied, as per comment 7 and comment 8
Attachment #717053 -
Flags: review?(jhammel) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
thanks for the review, this should address your concerns!
Attachment #717053 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #718581 -
Flags: review?(jhammel)
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #718581 -
Flags: review?(jhammel) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•