Closed
Bug 851106
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Rooting Analysis: Crash [@ js::ObjectImpl::setSlot]
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: decoder, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: crash, testcase, Whiteboard: [jsbugmon:ignore])
Crash Data
The following testcase crashes on mozilla-central built with --enable-root-analysis, revision 8e68f4d73ec4 (run with ):
gczeal(6);
var methods = [];
for (var i = 0; i > -100; i-- ) {
obj = { m: function () {} };
obj.watch("m", function (id, oldval, newval) {
methods[i] = oldval;
});
obj.m = 0;
}
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Crash trace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
js::ObjectImpl::setSlot (this=0xf742f060, slot=60, value=...) at js/src/vm/ObjectImpl-inl.h:208
208 MOZ_ASSERT(IsObjectValueInCompartment(value, compartment()));
(gdb) bt
#0 js::ObjectImpl::setSlot (this=0xf742f060, slot=60, value=...) at js/src/vm/ObjectImpl-inl.h:208
#1 0x081dd8e0 in nativeSetSlot (value=..., slot=<optimized out>, this=<optimized out>) at js/src/jsobjinlines.h:1052
#2 DefinePropertyOrElement (cx=<optimized out>, obj=(JSObject * const) 0xf742f060 [object Array], id=$jsid("-61"), getter=
0x806e1a0 <JS_PropertyStub(JSContext*, JS::Handle<JSObject*>, JS::Handle<jsid>, JS::MutableHandle<JS::Value>)>, setter=
0x806e1b0 <JS_StrictPropertyStub(JSContext*, JS::Handle<JSObject*>, JS::Handle<jsid>, int, JS::MutableHandle<JS::Value>)>, attrs=1, flags=0, shortid=0, value=$jsval(-nan(0xfff87da41d480)), callSetterAfterwards=
true, setterIsStrict=false) at js/src/jsobj.cpp:3226
#3 0x081de7ed in js::baseops::SetPropertyHelper (cx=0x8948a78, obj=..., receiver=(JSObject * const) 0xf742f060 [object Array], id=$jsid("-61"), defineHow=0, vp=$jsval(-nan(0xfff87da41d480)), strict=0)
at js/src/jsobj.cpp:4176
#4 0x08727c51 in setGeneric (strict=0, vp=..., id=..., receiver=..., obj=..., cx=0x8948a78) at ../jsobjinlines.h:89
#5 js::mjit::stubs::SetElem<0> (f=...) at js/src/methodjit/StubCalls.cpp:160
#6 0xf7fc79bc in ?? ()
#7 0x0890aff4 in ?? ()
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Sorry, I totally missed this when you filed it. I was not able to reproduce on the given revision with:
CC="gcc -m32" CXX="g++ -m32" ./configure --enable-optimize --enable-debug --target=i686-linux-gnu --disable-threadsafe --enable-root-analysis --enable-gczeal --enable-valgrind --enable-more-deterministic --with-system-nspr
gcc (Gentoo 4.6.3 p1.13, pie-0.5.2) 4.6.3
I also tried a 64 bit build without success.
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Because of the high false postive rate and difficulty of reproducing these bugs, we have switched our efforts to static analysis and zeal 7.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•