Closed Bug 860680 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

[SMS][MMS] Include new layout in SMS/MMS App

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::SMS, defect)

ARM
Gonk (Firefox OS)
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(blocking-b2g:leo+, b2g18 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
blocking-b2g leo+
Tracking Status
b2g18 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: borjasalguero, Assigned: borjasalguero)

References

Details

Attachments

(3 files, 2 obsolete files)

      No description provided.
Assignee: nobody → fbsc
Attached image Visual design 1. (obsolete) —
Attached image Visual design 2. (obsolete) —
Attached file Pull Request
New visuals will be attached to this bug asap due to there are some tweaks based on the first proposal.
Attachment #739031 - Flags: feedback?(felash)
Attached image New visual 1
Attachment #736198 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached image New visual 2
Attachment #736199 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #739031 - Flags: feedback?(schung)
Blocks: 837994
Comment on attachment 739031 [details]
Pull Request

Review needed for the new Strings
Attachment #739031 - Flags: review?(stas)
Attachment #739031 - Flags: review?(l10n)
Which branch is this supposed to land on?  The blocking flags tell me nothing.

If master and/or v1-train, no l10n review is needed.

That said, the "recipientRemoval" string has an unnecessary quote at the end: 

+recipientRemoval   = Do you want to remove {{recipient}} from the recipients list?'
Comment on attachment 739031 [details]
Pull Request

Ready to be reviewed! Tests added as well.
Attachment #739031 - Flags: review?(felash)
Attachment #739031 - Flags: feedback?(schung)
Attachment #739031 - Flags: feedback?(felash)
afaik this should be leo+ right ?
blocking-b2g: --- → leo?
Blocking since this affects multi-recipient messaging.
blocking-b2g: leo? → leo+
reviewed in github
Comment on attachment 739031 [details]
Pull Request

Looking at Julien's comments on the patch, this isn't ready for l10n review yet.

Julien, it'd be helpful for others that look at the patch if you could flip a review flag on the attachment here in either direction, too.
Attachment #739031 - Flags: review?(stas)
Attachment #739031 - Flags: review?(l10n)
Pike> oki, I will do that now, if there are multiple reviewers
Blocks: 861227
No longer blocks: 837994
Comment on attachment 739031 [details]
Pull Request

r=me

this is not perfect but good enough so let's enable other people work.
Attachment #739031 - Flags: review?(felash) → review+
Here there are some stuff to do, and It will be complete through 861227 & 837994.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Merge conflicts cannot uplift to v1-train
Flags: needinfo?(fbsc)
will resolve conflicts
Flags: needinfo?(fbsc) → needinfo?(felash)
I was not able to uplift this bug to v1-train.  If this bug has dependencies which are not marked in this bug, please comment on this bug.  If this bug depends on patches that aren't approved for v1-train, we need to re-evaluate the approval.  Otherwise, if this is just a merge conflict, you might be able to resolve it with:

  git checkout v1-train
  git cherry-pick -x -m1 60cdc0740438986c4fe502eb9c0822ce14248ef7
  <RESOLVE MERGE CONFLICTS>
  git commit
v1-train: 8980fddbd44e1c61482d6d339eacf7b3e95910d0
Flags: needinfo?(felash)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: