Closed
Bug 868892
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 2 years ago
Bug 868556 caused failures in two webgl-color-alpha-test.html tests
Categories
(Core :: Graphics, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: philor, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: [leave open])
Because there's basically no upper limit on the size of our clownshoes, after bug 868556 landed causing bustage in the reftest hunk I'd just unhidden, got backed out, then relanded annotating that reftest as failing, I noticed that it also caused two failures in the other hidden reftest hunk, the one that remains hidden.
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=22609952&tree=Mozilla-Inbound
b2g_ics_armv7a_gecko_emulator mozilla-inbound opt test reftest-6 on 2013-05-05 07:21:12 PDT for push 39c44b2b1ef5
slave: talos-r3-fed-044
07:29:48 INFO - REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | http://10.0.2.2:8888/tests/content/canvas/test/reftest/webgl-color-alpha-test.html?colorVal=0.0&alphaVal=1.0&nogl | image comparison (==), max difference: 255, number of differing pixels: 65536
07:29:56 INFO - REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | http://10.0.2.2:8888/tests/content/canvas/test/reftest/webgl-color-alpha-test.html?colorVal=0.0&alphaVal=1.0 | image comparison (==), max difference: 255, number of differing pixels: 65536
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Annotated as fails-if in https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/d934049e9047
Whiteboard: [leave open]
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Thanks for handling this rather than backing me out again. Given comment 1, does this need more action? Why [leave open]?
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
My theory was that failing wasn't a permanent mandatory condition, but a bug that should be fixed.
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Oh, that does make sense.
It is likely that that is the same bug as the reftest-1 failure, and that is being fixed in bug 869011.
Depends on: 869011
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
No idea, I haven't looked at or spoken to anyone about b2g tests since they became tier-3, to know whether or not we still run them.
Flags: needinfo?(philringnalda)
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
Comment 8•2 years ago
|
||
Closing old B2G bugs
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 2 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•