Closed Bug 870241 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

[Buri][IOT]There is not way to dismiss updates received from the network without download them.

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::System, defect, P1)

ARM
Gonk (Firefox OS)
defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED INVALID

People

(Reporter: sync-1, Unassigned)

Details

(Whiteboard: Chile, IOT, buri)

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #451171 +++ DEFECT DESCRIPTION: There is not way to dismiss updates received from the network without download them. The DuT does not offer option to dismiss the updates from the network without download them, only two options are present "Later" and "Download". It should have other opction "Dismiss" REPRODUCING PROCEDURES: 1. In a new DuT, make the initialization process. 2. Wait with the DuT in idle state until it receives updates from the network. 3. Try to dismiss the updates without download them. EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR: The DuT must offer options to dismiss updates without download them. ASSOCIATE SPECIFICATION: TEST PLAN REFERENCE: TOOLS AND PLATFORMS USED: USER IMPACT: Intermediate REPRODUCING RATE: 100% For FT PR, Please list reference mobile's behavior: SW129 AU_LINUX_GECKO_ICS_STRAWBERRY_V1.01.00.01.019.094 Firefox os v1.0.1 Mozilla build ID:20130502070201 ++++++++++ end of initial bug #451171 description ++++++++++ CONTACT INFO (Name,Phone number): DEFECT DESCRIPTION: REPRODUCING PROCEDURES: EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR: ASSOCIATE SPECIFICATION: TEST PLAN REFERENCE: TOOLS AND PLATFORMS USED: USER IMPACT: REPRODUCING RATE: For FT PR, Please list reference mobile's behavior:
blocking-b2g: --- → tef?
traige with tef: this is a blocker for tef. Hi Marshall, mind taking a look? thanks
blocking-b2g: tef? → tef+
Flags: needinfo?(marshall)
Hi, We've been discussing internally this again, and we think we should not modify current behaviour. Apart from that, we've checked that this is not blocker for certification. Bug renominated to tef? Thanks! David
blocking-b2g: tef+ → tef?
triage: since it's not a blocker, tef-. leo? for consideration
blocking-b2g: tef? → leo?
This is invalid - it's by design that you cannot dismiss the system updates notification until the update is complete. You can delay the update, but can't dismiss it, because we're encouraging users to ensure they have the latest bits.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(marshall)
Resolution: --- → INVALID
blocking-b2g: leo? → ---
Whiteboard: Poland, IOT, Buri
Hi, Jason, Here we mean the application updates notification. They are also mandatory? Don't permit end user to dismiss? Amelie
Flags: needinfo?(jsmith)
(In reply to Amelie Kong from comment #5) > Hi, Jason, > > Here we mean the application updates notification. They are also mandatory? > Don't permit end user to dismiss? > > Amelie That's right. Those can't be dismissed either. I believe that was by design as well, but let me bounce this over to Josh to see what he thinks.
Flags: needinfo?(jsmith) → needinfo?(jcarpenter)
Whiteboard: Poland, IOT, Buri → Chile, IOT, buri
Flags: needinfo?(jcarpenter)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.