871381 - [Buri][SMS]The FireFox phone cannot support SingleShift/lockingShift coding for SMS message

Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: RIL, defect, P1)

Description

[sync-1]

AU_LINUX_GECKO_ICS_STRAWBERRY_V1.01.00.01.019.099
 Firefox os  v1.0.1
 Mozilla build ID:20130506230205
 
 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #452218 +++
 
 DEFECT DESCRIPTION:
 [SMS]The FireFox phone cannot support SingleShift/lockingShift coding for SMS message
 
 
  REPRODUCING PROCEDURES:
 For 3GPP TS23.038 reference
 About SingleShift/lockingShift coding for SMS message, the phone cannot support.
 
 
  EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR:
 It should support.
 SingleShift/lockingShift coding counter:155/1,143/1,129/1
 
 
  ASSOCIATE SPECIFICATION:
 
  TEST PLAN REFERENCE:
 
  TOOLS AND PLATFORMS USED:
 
  USER IMPACT:
 Medium
  REPRODUCING RATE:
 5/5
  For FT PR, Please list reference mobile's behavior:
 
 ++++++++++ end of initial bug #452218 description ++++++++++
 
 
 
 CONTACT INFO (Name,Phone number):
 
  DEFECT DESCRIPTION:
 
  REPRODUCING PROCEDURES:
 
  EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR:
 
  ASSOCIATE SPECIFICATION:
 
  TEST PLAN REFERENCE:
 
  TOOLS AND PLATFORMS USED:
 
  USER IMPACT:
 
  REPRODUCING RATE:
 
  For FT PR, Please list reference mobile's behavior:

Comment 1

[Anshul]

We currently don't support the shift tables. Is this test case a certification blocker and if yes is it blocking any GCF test case?

Comment 2

[田旻]

(In reply to Anshul from comment #1)
> We currently don't support the shift tables. Is this test case a
> certification blocker and if yes is it blocking any GCF test case?

No, it isn't a certification blocker nor blocking any GCF case.

Comment 3

[田旻]

Without the SingleShift/lockingShift , end user has to cost more money (about twice of what they used) for their short messages.  Thus I think we'd better add this function.

Comment 4

[田旻]

Hi, is there any advances about this problem?

Comment 5

[Anshul]

No there is not as the team is busy with other leo/tef blocking bugs.

Comment 6

[Julien Wajsberg [:julienw]]

Is bug 914454 a duplicate of this, or don't we have shift coding for greek letters ?

Vicamo said there that we're supporting this in MozRIL but we don't enable this.

Comment 7

[田旻]

Bug 914454 is more specific and more detial than this one. The key point is user can't use this function if it just stay in MozRIL without enabling.

Comment 8

[田旻]

(In reply to Julien Wajsberg [:julienw] from comment #6)
> Is bug 914454 a duplicate of this, or don't we have shift coding for greek
> letters ?
> 
> Vicamo said there that we're supporting this in MozRIL but we don't enable
> this.

But this bug includes more infos than bug 914454,  and bug 914454 rely on this one to some extent.

Comment 9

[Kai-Chih Hu [:khu]]

Looks like something related to comms team? Joe?

Comment 10

[Preeti Raghunath(:Preeti)]

Joe,

Please triage as we in triage believe it is a feature.

Comment 11

[Preeti Raghunath(:Preeti)]

Minus for now, please renom if necessary

Comment 12

[Joe Cheng [:jcheng] (please needinfo)]

Vicamo, can we have your comment on this bug?
it seems like there is a table maintained on RIL side but likely partner also need to cross check on commercial RIL? Thanks

Comment 13

[Vicamo Yang [:vicamo][:vyang]]

Sometimes I do have trouble reading the DEFECT DESCRIPTION and REPRODUCING PROCEDURES.  The thing you have in REPRODUCING PROCEDURES is certainly not some kind of steps, actions.  Please be more specific.

In Firefox OS we do have single shift/locking shift logic implemented.  The thing we don't have yet is the way to enable "extra" national alphabets.  Yes, even those alphabets are already there.  So, what does this bug actually mean?  It sounds like a duplicate of bug 733331, not bug 914454.

Comment 14

[Vicamo Yang [:vicamo][:vyang]]

We're moving all RIL related bugs to Boot2Gecko::RIL.  Thank you :)

Comment 15

[Vicamo Yang [:vicamo][:vyang]]

ni for detailed STR and/or expectation for this bug.

Comment 16

[Vicamo Yang [:vicamo][:vyang]]

Resolving as WORKSFORME because we do have single shift/locking shift logic since 2012 bug 729876.