The last rooting hazard in the shell (after fixing bug 872638) very much looks like a false positive. Can this be addressed in the analysis, or should we simply ignore it? (Or am I actually mistaken and it really *is* a hazard, after all?)
(In reply to Till Schneidereit [:till] from comment #0) Yes, it's a false positive, and sfink is investigating making the analysis handle it.
So we don't have any rooting hazards in the shell, anymore! \o/
Whatever this was is now gone, it seems.