Closed
Bug 877982
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
JAWS misses textarea in Firefox 23
Categories
(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)
Core
Disability Access APIs
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox23 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: surkov, Assigned: surkov)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Keywords: access)
Attachments
(1 file)
1.05 KB,
patch
|
tbsaunde
:
review+
lsblakk
:
approval-mozilla-aurora+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
JAWS misses textarea because we started to expose textarea children in Firefox 23 because of bug 865997. It's not a problem on trunk because it was fixed by bug 873358. We can't backport bug 873358 because it regressed by bug 875794 which will be fixed by set of related patches. Thus we need to back out partially bug 865997 that caused this problem.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → surkov.alexander
Attachment #756427 -
Flags: review?(trev.saunders)
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 756427 [details] [diff] [review] patch patches to that function are almost unreadable, maybe we should convert role checks to simple if and return or if we really think compilers can't figure that out array and loop. complaining asside this seems fine
Attachment #756427 -
Flags: review?(trev.saunders) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
this patch goes into aurora only, thus maybe it doesn't important
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
can we get a try build against aurora?
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #3) > this patch goes into aurora only, thus maybe it doesn't important sure, but I don't see why that should mean we shouldn't clean this code up some day. (In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #4) > can we get a try build against aurora? I don't see a reason you can't push aurora with this patch to try
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Trevor Saunders (:tbsaunde) from comment #5) > (In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #3) > > this patch goes into aurora only, thus maybe it doesn't important > > sure, but I don't see why that should mean we shouldn't clean this code up > some day. I thought you concerned this patch only. > (In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #4) > > can we get a try build against aurora? > > I don't see a reason you can't push aurora with this patch to try do I need aurora repo on my machine for that?
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #6) > (In reply to Trevor Saunders (:tbsaunde) from comment #5) > > (In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #3) > > > this patch goes into aurora only, thus maybe it doesn't important > > > > sure, but I don't see why that should mean we shouldn't clean this code up > > some day. > > I thought you concerned this patch only. not really > > (In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #4) > > > can we get a try build against aurora? > > > > I don't see a reason you can't push aurora with this patch to try > > do I need aurora repo on my machine for that? I can't see how you'd push commits you don't have locally
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
can you do that for me?
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #8) > can you do that for me? I can, *after* the bug has received approval for it. I will request it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
I meant a try build against aurora branch.
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 756427 [details] [diff] [review] patch [Approval Request Comment] Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): 865997 User impact if declined: Users of the popular screen reader JAWS would no longer be able to access and focus any text area form elements. Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): No, this is an aurora-specific partial backout of bug 865997, see comment #0 for a more detailed description of why this is needed. Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): None. String or IDL/UUID changes made by this patch: None.
Attachment #756427 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #756427 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-aurora+
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
Pushed to Aurora and marking fixed since this is an aurora (Firefox 23) specific bug. https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/2e6aaff6439a
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•