Closed Bug 885233 Opened 11 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Use python2 when available in activation script

Categories

(Add-on SDK Graveyard :: General, defect, P3)

defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: marek, Assigned: marek)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:21.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/21.0 (Beta/Release) Build ID: 20130514164240 Steps to reproduce: Just ran bin/activate on and Arch Linux machine. The activation script will nicely say that you are using Python3 and it's not ready for that. Actual results: When I then ran bin/cfx it failed with an error because of the difference between python2 and python3 Expected results: I believe that when running bin/activate it should detect that `which python2` actually exists and change every occurence of python to python2. The Arch Linux AUR PKGBUILD solves this with a oneliner grep -Rl python . | xargs sed -ri 's/([^!]|^)python(\s|$)/\1python2\2/g' which I think should be also added to the activation script along with the detection code described above. Since it's also written in bash it should not be a big technical issue. If you decide this issue is worth fixing I'd like to try to fix it. Thanks
We'd like to have you try to fix it. :)
Assignee: nobody → marek
Priority: -- → P3
I have submitted the pull request here. https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/pull/1088 In there I tried (and to my understanding) also fixed it. Please let me know if it's good enough.
Hey Brian, would you have some time to review this patch ? I don't think we do really have python people on a team to reason about this changes.
Flags: needinfo?(rFobic) → needinfo?(warner-bugzilla)
Cc-ing Mossop, since he should have a better idea who can review this.
Comments added to the pull request.. the idea is ok, but the patch is a bit overkill IMO, there's probably a gentler way to do it.
Flags: needinfo?(warner-bugzilla)
Flags: needinfo?(dtownsend+bugmail)
Attached file pull request
Sorry that this slipped by me, I'll get this reviewed.
Attachment #8334845 - Flags: review?(dtownsend+bugmail)
Flags: needinfo?(dtownsend+bugmail)
Comment on attachment 8334845 [details] [review] pull request I don't have a problem with how it selects which python in activate but modifying bin/cfx as part of that isn't acceptable.
Attachment #8334845 - Flags: review?(dtownsend+bugmail) → review-
I submitted a PR on github at https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/pull/1602 for this issue, but perhaps it was ignored since I didn't bring it up here. This works as long as all the platforms supported are new enough to have a python2 binary. Are there any systems in the last ~ three years that don't have it?
Attached patch PR1604.patchSplinter Review
Adding a patch for this bug. I can rebase on master if needed, although I can't run testcfx on master as is. See https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/pull/1602
Attachment #8530578 - Flags: review?
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Sorry we won't be releasing any new versions of cfx, jpm is the replacement https://www.npmjs.com/package/jpm
Resolution: FIXED → WONTFIX
Attachment #8530578 - Flags: review?
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: